Evaluation and comparison of SHA.LIN, S.T.O.N.E nephrolithometry scoring system and Guy's stone score in predicting the accuracy of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL) outcomes

医学 经皮肾镜取石术 接收机工作特性 逻辑回归 列线图 核医学 外科 经皮 内科学
作者
Guohui Peng,Hanzhong Li,Bingcheng Li,Xuebin Zhang,Jianhua Deng,Yuanfa Feng,Manchao Cao,Guixiang Xu
出处
期刊:Chinese Journal of Urology [Chinese Medical Association]
卷期号:37 (3): 199-205
标识
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2016.03.010
摘要

Objective To compared the accuracy of the SHA.LIN, S. T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring system and Guy's stone score in the same cohort and to determine which was most predictive of percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL) outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of clinical data of 123 patients with nephrolithiasis undergoing PCNL from June 2011 and June 2015 in two hospitals. The SHA.LIN nephrolithometry score , the S. T.O.N.E. score and the Guy's stone score based on preoperative computerized tomography images were calculated. A single observer reviewed all images and assigned scores. Logistic and linear regression analysis were performed and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to determine the most predictive scoring system. Results The stone free rate was 76.4%(94/123) and postoperative complications occurred in 33(26.8%) cases.In stone-free patients vs. those with residual stones the mean SHA.LIN nephrolithometry score was 8.2 vs. 11.8, the mean S. T.O.N.E. score was 7.3 vs. 8.6 and the mean Guy's stone score was 2.4 vs.3.0 (each P=0.000). Logistic regression revealed that SHA.LIN nephrolithometry score, S. T.O.N.E. score and the Guy's stone score were significantly associated with stone-free status (each P=0.000) and postoperative complications(P<0.05). The SHA.LIN nephrolithometry score was associated with operation time and estimated blood loss (P=0.000 and 0.011). S. T.O.N.E. score and Guy's stone score were associated with operation time (P=0.000 and 0.006, respectively). All scoring systems did not predict length of stay. There was significant difference in the areas under the curves(AUC) for the SHA.LIN vs. S. T.O.N.E. scoring system [0.924(95%CI 0.874-0.975)vs. 0.795(95%CI 0.698-0.891), P=0.001] and for the SHA.LIN nephrolithometry score vs Guy's stone score [0.924(95%CI 0.874-0.975) vs. 0.701(95%CI 0.592-0.811), P<0.000]. Conclusion All scoring systems have comparable accuracies and the predictive accuracy of the SHA.LIN scoring system is more precise than the S. T.O.N.E. score and the Guy's score in predicting post-PCNL stonefree status and postoperative complications. Key words: Kidney calculi; Nephrostomy, percutaneous; Classification; Prognosis; Perioperative period
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
大模型应助Nathan采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
wan发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
搜集达人应助文献需求组采纳,获得10
3秒前
silicate完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
桃子e完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
嘟嘟发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
文文文文文完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
可爱的函函应助love采纳,获得10
5秒前
zhichao发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
xpfwg完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
10秒前
Asher完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
领导范儿应助不爱胡萝卜采纳,获得10
11秒前
xpfwg关注了科研通微信公众号
11秒前
Yxxx完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Lucas应助眯眯眼的枕头采纳,获得10
12秒前
舒心钧完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
默默幼南发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
123完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
啦啦咔嘞发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
寻北意发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
默默幼南完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
乔恶霸完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
烟花应助健忘的曼卉采纳,获得10
20秒前
20秒前
20秒前
葉鳳怡完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
星辰大海应助123采纳,获得10
22秒前
LEI发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
善学以致用应助杨宗智采纳,获得10
22秒前
23秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
计划经济时代的工厂管理与工人状况(1949-1966)——以郑州市国营工厂为例 500
Sociologies et cosmopolitisme méthodologique 400
Why America Can't Retrench (And How it Might) 400
Another look at Archaeopteryx as the oldest bird 390
创造互补优势国外有人/无人协同解析 300
The Great Psychology Delusion 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4647999
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4037024
关于积分的说明 12486766
捐赠科研通 3726591
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2056876
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1087783
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 969129