医学
危险系数
群体反应性抗体
优势比
置信区间
心脏移植
内科学
移植
肾移植
作者
Juan B. Ivey‐Miranda,Steffne Kunnirickal,Laurine Bow,Christopher Maulion,Jeffrey M. Testani,Daniel Jacoby,E. Kransdorf,Lavanya Bellumkonda
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.07.012
摘要
ABSTRACT Background Sensitized patients awaiting heart transplantation spend a longer time on the waitlist and have higher mortality. We are now able to further characterize sensitization by discriminating antibodies against class I and II, but the differential impact of these has not been assessed systematically. Methods and Results Using United Network for Organ Sharing data (2004–2015), we analyzed 17,361 adult heart transplant patients whose class I and II panel reactive antibodies were reported. Patients were divided into 4 groups: class I and II ≤25% (group 1); class I ≤25% and class II ˃25% (group 2); class II ≤25% and class I >25% (group 3); and both class I and II >25% (group 4). Outcomes assessed were treated rejection at 1-year mortality, all-cause mortality, and rejection-related mortality. Compared with group 1, only group 4 was associated with a higher risk of treated rejection at 1 year (odds ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–1.64), all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.24, 95% CI 1.06–1.46), and mortality owing to rejection (subhazard ratio 1.84, 95% CI 1.18–2.85), whereas groups 2 and 3 were not (P > .05). Conclusions Combined elevation in class I and II panel reactive antibodies seem to increase the risk of treated rejection and all-cause mortality, whereas risk with isolated elevation is unclear.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI