贝克抑郁量表
心理学
萧条(经济学)
双相情感障碍
精神科
临床心理学
心情
判别效度
重性抑郁障碍
评定量表
焦虑
结构效度
内部一致性
心理测量学
发展心理学
经济
宏观经济学
作者
A. John Rush,Donna E. Giles,Michael A. Schlesser,Carl L. Fulton,Jan Weissenburger,Cheryl Burns
标识
DOI:10.1016/0165-1781(86)90060-0
摘要
The Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology (IDS) is a new measure of depressive signs and symptoms. Both self-report and clinician-rated versions are under development. The IDS-SR (self-report) was completed by 289 patients, 285 of whom were outpatients. Unipolar major depression (n = 174), bipolar disorder (n = 44), euthymic (S / P unipolar or bipolar) depression (n = 33), and other psychiatric disorders (n = 38) were included. The IDS-SR had good internal reliability (coefficient α = 0.85), and significantly correlated with both the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) (r = 0.67) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (r = 0.78). The clinician-rated IDS (IDS-C) was administered to 82 outpatients (75 with unipolar or bipolar disorder, 5 with other psychiatric disorders, and 2 euthymic (S / P unipolar) depressions). Coefficient α (0.88) suggested strong internal consistency. The IDS-C correlated highly with both the HRSD (r = 0.92) and the BDI (r = 0.61). Discriminant and factor analyses provided evidence for construct validity for both the IDS-C and IDS-SR. Both scales significantly differentiated endogenous from nonendogenous depression defined by Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC). Factor structures for the IDS-SR revealed four factors: mood/cognition, anxiety, selected endogenous symptoms, and hyperphagia-hypersomnia. The IDS appears applicable to both inpatients and outpatients with endogenous, atypical, and nonendogenous major depression, and may have utility with dysthymics.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI