医学
角膜曲率计
人工晶状体度数计算
眼科
人工晶状体
验光服务
图表
折射误差
折射
白内障手术
斯内伦图
均方预测误差
光学相干层析成像
视力
激光矫视
人工晶状体
角膜
眼压
镜头(地质)
超声乳化术
角膜地形图
眼病
前瞻性队列研究
作者
Hasan Alsetri,Mitchell P. Weikert,Nicole R. Fram,Jared Pagal,Karolinne Maia Rocha,Marcela Feltrin de Barros,Daniel H. Chang,Brandon D. Ayres,Damien F. Goldberg,Jonathan Solomon,Elizabeth Yeu,John D. Sheppard
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulae incorporating posterior corneal power vs traditional keratometry in post-laser vision correction (LVC) eyes undergoing cataract surgery. Patients and Methods: This multicenter study (7 sites) combined retrospective chart review and prospective enrollment of adult cataract surgery patients with prior myopic or hyperopic LVC (one study eye per patient). Preoperative biometry was obtained by swept-source optical coherence tomography, and refractive prediction accuracy was compared across six IOL formulae (Barrett True K-AK, Barrett True K-TK, EVO 2.0-AK, EVO 2.0-TK, Haigis-TK, and Shammas-Cooke) in terms of trueness (mean refractive prediction error [RPE]), precision (RPE dispersion), and accuracy (absolute error metrics and proportion of eyes within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D). Results: A total of 154 eyes were included. The proportion of eyes within ±0.5 D of predicted refraction was highest with EVO 2.0-TK in both post-myopic (77%) and post-hyperopic (88%) LVC eyes, with Barrett True K-TK next highest (75% and 78%, respectively); in post-myopic eyes, EVO 2.0-TK was also the only formula whose mean RPE did not differ significantly from zero. Conclusions: EVO 2.0-TK demonstrated the highest overall accuracy among the formulae evaluated in both post-myopic and post-hyperopic LVC eyes, while Barrett True K-TK also performed well, with both formulae achieving ≥75% of eyes within ±0.50 D in both LVC subgroups.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI