阿卡克信息准则
频数推理
贝叶斯信息准则
选型
偏差信息准则
贝叶斯因子
计算机科学
推论
数学
信息标准
贝叶斯概率
统计
背景(考古学)
计量经济学
贝叶斯推理
人工智能
古生物学
生物
作者
Kenneth P. Burnham,David R. Anderson
标识
DOI:10.1177/0049124104268644
摘要
The model selection literature has been generally poor at reflecting the deep foundations of the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and at making appropriate comparisons to the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). There is a clear philosophy, a sound criterion based in information theory, and a rigorous statistical foundation for AIC. AIC can be justified as Bayesian using a “savvy” prior on models that is a function of sample size and the number of model parameters. Furthermore, BIC can be derived as a non-Bayesian result. Therefore, arguments about using AIC versus BIC for model selection cannot be from a Bayes versus frequentist perspective. The philosophical context of what is assumed about reality, approximating models, and the intent of model-based inference should determine whether AIC or BIC is used. Various facets of such multimodel inference are presented here, particularly methods of model averaging.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI