克朗巴赫阿尔法
可读性
表面有效性
比例(比率)
考试(生物学)
结构效度
焦点小组
透视图(图形)
医学
医疗保健
可靠性(半导体)
心理学
护理部
患者满意度
心理测量学
临床心理学
计算机科学
生物
古生物学
经济增长
语言学
经济
业务
物理
人工智能
哲学
功率(物理)
营销
量子力学
作者
Lisa Dolovich,Kalpana Nair,Donna Ciliska,Hui N. Lee,Stephen Birch,Amiram Gafni,Dereck L. Hunt
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2004.00517.x
摘要
The purpose of the present study was to develop and pilot test a questionnaire to assess continuity of care from the perspective of patients with diabetes. Seven patient and two healthcare-provider focus groups were conducted. These focus groups generated 777 potential items. This number was reduced to 56 items after item reduction, face validity testing and readability analysis, and to 47 items after a preliminary factor analysis. Readability was assessed as requiring 7-8 years of schooling. Sixty adult patients with diabetes completed the draft Diabetes Continuity of Care Scale (DCCS) at a single point in time to assess the validity of the instrument. Patients completed the draft DCCS again 2 weeks later to assess test-retest reliability. A provisional factor analysis and grouping according to clinical sense yielded five domains: access and getting care, care by doctor, care by other healthcare professionals, communication between healthcare professionals, and self-care. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) for the whole scale was 0.89. The test-retest reliability was r = 0.73. The DCCS total score was moderately correlated with some of the measures used to establish construct validity. The DCCS could differentiate between patients who did and did not achieve specific process and clinical indicators of good diabetes care (e.g. Hba1c tested within 6 months). The development of the DCCS was centred on the patient's perspective and revealed that the patient perspective regarding continuity of care extends beyond the concept of seeing one doctor. Initial testing of this instrument demonstrates that it has promise as a reliable and valid measure in this area.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI