牙本质过敏症
牙膏
医学
牙科
显著性差异
随机对照试验
氟化钠
氟化物
平均差
牙本质过敏症
阴性对照
牙膏
阳性对照
无水的
置信区间
内科学
化学
牙本质
传统医学
无机化学
有机化学
作者
Danying Tao,Martin R. Ling,Xiping Feng,John Gallob,Audrey Souverain,Wenjie Yang,A. Alavi
摘要
To compare efficacy of an anhydrous 0.454% w/w stannous fluoride/sodium fluoride toothpaste (Test) versus a sodium monofluorophosphate toothpaste (Negative control) and a stannous chloride/sodium fluoride toothpaste (Positive control) for dentine hypersensitivity relief after 8 weeks' twice-daily use.In this randomized, examiner-blind, stratified, parallel study, primary and secondary efficacy variables were mean changes in Schiff score (evaporative [air] sensitivity) and tactile threshold (Yeaple probe), respectively, from baseline to Week 8 between Test (n = 62) and Negative control (n = 62). Test and Positive control (n = 61) comparisons were exploratory objectives.All groups significantly improved from baseline on both dentine hypersensitivity measures (p < .0001). Difference between adjusted mean changes from baseline in Schiff sensitivity scores at Week 8 for Test versus Negative control groups was 0.19 (95% CI 0.002, 0.374), in favour of the Negative control (p = .0476; 12.57% difference). Difference in tactile threshold was -7.20 g (95% CI -16.376, 1.975), and this was not statistically significant (p = .3715; -21.83% difference). Test group showed no significant difference versus Positive control for either measure. Toothpastes were generally well tolerated.While twice-daily use of Test toothpaste significantly reduced dentine hypersensitivity from baseline, there was no significant advantage over negative or positive controls.Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT03310268.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI