记忆的错误归因
认知
对偶(语法数字)
实证研究
过程(计算)
内隐联想测验
心理学
社会认知
双重过程理论(道德心理学)
认知心理学
道德
社会心理学
认知科学
认识论
计算机科学
神经科学
艺术
哲学
文学类
操作系统
作者
Andrew Miles,Raphaël Charron‐Chénier,Cyrus Schleifer
标识
DOI:10.1177/0003122419832497
摘要
Dual-process models are increasingly popular in sociology as a framework for theorizing the role of automatic cognition in shaping social behavior. However, empirical studies using dual-process models often rely on ad hoc measures such as forced-choice surveys, observation, and interviews whose relationships to underlying cognitive processes are not fully established. In this article, we advance dual-process research in sociology by (1) proposing criteria for measuring automatic cognition, and (2) assessing the empirical performance of two popular measures of automatic cognition developed by psychologists. We compare the ability of the Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT), the Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP), and traditional forced-choice measures to predict process-pure estimates of automatic influences on individuals’ behavior during a survey task. Results from three studies focusing on politics, morality, and racial attitudes suggest the AMP provides the most valid and consistent measure of automatic cognitive processes. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings for sociological practice.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI