医学
置信区间
脾动脉
内科学
胰腺导管腺癌
腺癌
放射性武器
放射科
荟萃分析
胃肠病学
总体生存率
肿瘤科
胰腺癌
子群分析
存活率
胰腺癌
脾静脉
门静脉
危险系数
新辅助治疗
动脉
血管侵犯
外科
原发性肿瘤
作者
Ziying Yao,Jinyin Zhang,Chunlu Tan,Xubao Liu,Ke Deng,QingQuan Tan,Xing Wang
标识
DOI:10.1097/js9.0000000000003927
摘要
Background: The prognostic impact of radiographic splenic vessel involvement in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the body and tail remains controversial. Methods: A systematic search was performed using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus in accordance with the PRISMA and AMASTAR guidelines. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS). Time-to-event method was used. Results: Eight articles involving 1678 patients were analyzed. Patients with radiological splenic artery (SA) invasion had poorer OS than those without (hazard ratio (HR) 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14–2.29; P = 0.007). Similarly, radiological splenic vein (SV) involvement was associated with significantly worse OS (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.13–2.44; P = 0.010). Subgroup analyses for SA involvement, categorized by “abutment” and “encasement,” showed an overall HR of 2.35 (95% CI 1.72–3.19; P < 0.00001), with HRs of 1.77 (95% CI 1.25–2.59; P = 0.001) for abutment and 3.03 (95% CI 2.20–4.17; P < 0.00001) for encasement, indicating a significant difference between subgroups (P = 0.02). For SV involvement, the overall HR was 2.15 (95% CI 1.49–3.10; P < 0.001), with HRs of 1.66 (95% CI 0.97–2.84; P = 0.07) for abutment and 2.80 (95% CI 1.98–3.96; P < 0.0001) for encasement, showing no significant difference between subgroups (P = 0.11). Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed worse survival in patients with splenic vessel infiltration of PDAC. Therefore, SA and SV invasion may serve as indications for neoadjuvant therapy for resectable PDAC.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI