Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of community perinatal mental health services on access, experience, recovery/relapse and obstetric and neonate outcomes: the ESMI-II mixed-methods study

Background Perinatal mental health disorders affect one in five mothers during pregnancy or within 2 years post childbirth. These disorders can lead to poor pregnancy and childbirth outcomes and maternal deaths. Additionally, they negatively affect a child’s cognitive, social and emotional development. Stigma and a lack of specialised services have limited access to mental health care. National Health Service England invested £365M in community perinatal mental health teams, but their impact on women and infants’ outcomes are not known. Objectives Develop a taxonomy of community perinatal mental health teams (work package 1). Compare and validate two assessments of quality of mother–infant interaction for use by community perinatal mental health teams (work package 2). Evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of community perinatal mental health teams (work packages 3 and 4). Design Mixed-methods study. Setting Community perinatal mental health teams in England. Participants Women who were pregnant or within 2 years postnatal. Methods and outcome measures Work package 1: Typology of community perinatal mental health teams in England. Work package 2: Reliability and validity of two observational assessments of parent–infant interaction. Work package 3: Realist evaluation interviews with women, partners/close others, and staff to determine effective community perinatal mental health team components. Work package 4: Analysis of linked data: Association of community perinatal mental health teams with access to secondary care mental health services. Risk of acute relapse and improved obstetric and neonate outcomes for women with pre-existing severe disorders in areas with community perinatal mental health teams compared to generic services. Economic analysis of cost of community perinatal mental health teams. Results Objective 1: Community perinatal mental health team typologies revealed in 2020, 84% had basic staffing levels and 63% had more multi-professionals. Objective 2: The ‘Parent Infant Interaction Observation Scale’ and ‘National Institute of Child Health and Human Development’ assessments of mother–infant interaction were reliable and valid; the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development is more suitable for community perinatal mental health teams. Objective 3: Work package 3: Interviews with 139 women, 55 partners/close others and 80 health workers highlighted the importance of specialist perinatal knowledge, responding in a warm and non-judgemental way, working closely with other healthcare providers, optimising medication, supporting mothers to reduce conflict and improve social support, helping mother–infant bonding, and teaching emotional management. Work package 4: Analysis of linked health data revealed higher risks for obstetric and neonate problems in women with severe mental health disorders, particularly recent or very serious episodes. Work package 4: Areas with community perinatal mental health teams saw increased mental health access among perinatal women and reduced need for acute care, albeit at a higher cost and with greater neonatal risks. Limitations High levels of missing data on diagnosis and mental health outcomes in existing health and service data. Lack of data on child outcomes. Evaluation occurred during community perinatal mental health team changes and the coronavirus disease discovered in 2019 pandemic limiting a full assessment of the impact of community perinatal mental health teams on maternal and child outcomes. Conclusions Community perinatal mental health teams can support perinatal women with complex, moderate/severe mental health disorders, but further attention to women’s physical needs is essential. The use of observational assessments of parent–infant relationships will enhance the evaluation of community perinatal mental health teams’ impact on infant outcomes. Future work Research should focus on prospective studies that gather mental health and child outcomes from community perinatal mental health teams and primary care mental health, to assess broader impacts of perinatal-specific treatment across care pathways. Study registration This study is registered on Research Registry as researchregistry5463. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/49/38) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research ; Vol. 13, No. 38. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.