Assessing ChatGPT Responses to Common Patient Questions Regarding Total Hip Arthroplasty

聊天机器人 医学 人气 主流 心理学 计算机科学 万维网 社会心理学 哲学 神学
作者
Aleksander P. Mika,J. Ryan Martin,Stephen M. Engstrom,Gregory G. Polkowski,Jacob M. Wilson
出处
期刊:Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume [Wolters Kluwer]
卷期号:105 (19): 1519-1526 被引量:126
标识
DOI:10.2106/jbjs.23.00209
摘要

The contemporary patient has access to numerous resources on common orthopaedic procedures before ever presenting for a clinical evaluation. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven chatbots have become mainstream, allowing patients to engage with interfaces that supply convincing, human-like responses to prompts. ChatGPT (OpenAI), a recently developed AI-based chat technology, is one such application that has garnered rapid growth in popularity. Given the likelihood that patients may soon call on this technology for preoperative education, we sought to determine whether ChatGPT could appropriately answer frequently asked questions regarding total hip arthroplasty (THA).Ten frequently asked questions regarding total hip arthroplasty were posed to the chatbot during a conversation thread, with no follow-up questions or repetition. Each response was analyzed for accuracy with use of an evidence-based approach. Responses were rated as "excellent response not requiring clarification," "satisfactory requiring minimal clarification," "satisfactory requiring moderate clarification," or "unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification."Of the responses given by the chatbot, only 1 received an "unsatisfactory" rating; 2 did not require any correction, and the majority required either minimal (4 of 10) or moderate (3 of 10) clarification. Although several responses required nuanced clarification, the chatbot's responses were generally unbiased and evidence-based, even for controversial topics.The chatbot effectively provided evidence-based responses to questions commonly asked by patients prior to THA. The chatbot presented information in a way that most patients would be able to understand. This resource may serve as a valuable clinical tool for patient education and understanding prior to orthopaedic consultation in the future.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
TTTaT完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
今后应助神勇的戒指采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
刘星完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
痴情的月饼完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Y82220057完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
8秒前
LKF完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
CGW完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
涨芝士发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
三氟乙酸关注了科研通微信公众号
11秒前
光亮向雁发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
cdercder应助认真以寒采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
Lucas应助鲍里斯瓦格采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
野良发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
星辰发布了新的文献求助20
20秒前
我是老大应助sam采纳,获得10
20秒前
科研通AI2S应助nanoletter采纳,获得10
20秒前
21秒前
21秒前
lynn发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
24秒前
马登发布了新的文献求助30
25秒前
三氟乙酸发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
涨芝士发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
26秒前
29秒前
HOME完成签到,获得积分20
29秒前
duck99完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
LKF发布了新的文献求助30
31秒前
你好好好发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
pinghu完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
Eric完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
阿海的发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
愉快的犀牛完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
ISCN 2024 – An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (2024) 3000
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
Encyclopedia of Geology (2nd Edition) 2000
105th Edition CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1600
Maneuvering of a Damaged Navy Combatant 650
Mindfulness and Character Strengths: A Practitioner's Guide to MBSP 380
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3776256
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3321728
关于积分的说明 10207386
捐赠科研通 3036979
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1666508
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 797517
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 757868