Domain Adaptation in LIBS Streaming Using Transfer Learning and Self-Learning for Soil Classification
作者
Yichao Huang,S. Mohalan,N. F. Beier,Abdul Bais,Amina Hussein,Miles F. Dyck,Frank A. Hegmann
出处
期刊:日期:2023-05-21卷期号:: 1-1
标识
DOI:10.1109/icops45740.2023.10481441
摘要
Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) has become a promising technology for determining the chemical composition of soil samples. The application of machine learning (ML) has accelerated the development of LIBS in soil analysis. However, ML for LIBS is challenging because 1) building robust ML models requires large calibration datasets while LIBS experimental data is typically limited, further limiting data streaming, 2) matrix effects deteriorate LIBS performance, and LIBS data is sensitive to changes in the apparatus, causing emission lines distribution highly variable. These issues may cause concept drift in LIBS streaming and make the relation between the input and the target spectra variable over time, leading to an ML model constructed for one LIBS system becomes less applicable to a different LIBS system. We propose transfer learning to conquer the challenges of limited data. We then use domain adaptation with self-learning to self-adapt to the domain shift in LIBS streaming to alleviate the matrix effects and improve the model generalization. To test the efficiency of the proposed method, we conduct experiments on the same soil samples but with different experiment parameters, such as wavelength and laser energy. The collected spectra are fed into our model in chunks. The EMSLIBS dataset used in the 2019 EMSLIBS competition is utilized to construct the transfer-learning model, which serves as the foundation for the model developed using our experimental data. Following this, self-learning is undertaken for each chunk by repeatedly predicting the current chunk using the model trained by previous chunks and then taking the confident predictions as pseudo-labels for co-training the model. It is shown that the average accuracy is improved by 9% with transfer learning and up to 15% better with transfer learning and self-learning during data streaming compared to an ML model that does not implement transfer learning and support adaption.