医学
中心静脉压
心脏病学
血管内容积状态
低血容量
内科学
休克(循环)
冲程容积
脉冲压力
下腔静脉
血压
血容量
麻醉
感染性休克
复苏
血流动力学
心率
败血症
作者
Zahra Jafari‐Giv,Alireza Vajhi,Saeed Farzad‐Mohajeri,Mahdi Hassankhani,Shohreh Alian Samakkhah,Amin Hemmati,Alireza Mohammadzade‐Akbari,Mohammadhossein Noroozzadegan
摘要
In the absence of vascular obstruction, central venous pressure (CVP) is a hydrostatic pressure in the cranial and caudal vena cava, providing valuable information about cardiac function and intravascular volume status. It is also a component in evaluating volume resuscitation in patients with septic shock and monitoring patients with right heart disease, pericardial disease, or volume depletion. Central venous pressure is calculated in dogs by invasive central venous catheterization, which is considered high-risk and impractical in critically ill patients. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using echocardiographic tricuspid E/E' as a noninvasive method to estimate CVP in anesthetized healthy dogs under controlled hypovolemic conditions. Ten male mixed-breed dogs were included in the study after a thorough health assessment. For hypovolemia induction, blood withdrawal was performed, and echocardiographic factors of the tricuspid valve, including peak E and E' velocities, were measured during CVP reduction. Repeated measures analysis of variance and Bonferroni post hoc tests were employed to compare the average difference between measured echocardiographic indices and CVP values derived from catheterization and intermittent measurement methods. Spearman's ρ correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between echocardiographic indices and CVP. E peak velocity had a significant negative correlation with venous blood pressure phases (r = -0.44, P = .001), indicating a decrease in peak E velocity with progressive CVP reduction. However, tricuspid valve E' peak velocity and E/E' did not correlate with CVP, suggesting that these parameters are not reliable for CVP estimation in dogs.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI