Effect of a Personalized Tobacco Treatment Intervention on Smoking Abstinence in Individuals Eligible for Lung Cancer Screening

医学 干预(咨询) 戒烟 禁欲 肺癌 癌症 肺癌筛查 内科学 肿瘤科 精神科 病理
作者
Brenda Cartmel,Lisa M. Fucito,Krysten W. Bold,Susan Neveu,Fangyong Li,Alana M. Rojewski,Ralitza Gueorguieva,Stephanie S. O’Malley,Roy S. Herbst,Benjamin A. Toll
出处
期刊:Journal of Thoracic Oncology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:19 (4): 643-649 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jtho.2023.11.012
摘要

Abstract

Introduction

To determine whether personalized gain-framed messaging and biomarker feedback related to tobacco cessation or reduction decrease smoking behavior in patients undergoing or eligible for lung cancer screening.

Methods

Between 2016 and 2020, 188 patients were enrolled in a two-phase, sequential, randomized controlled trial. Phase 1 evaluated whether standard of care (SC) (five in-person counseling sessions and 8 weeks of nicotine patch) plus gain-framed messaging (GFM) versus SC would increase 8-week biochemically verified smoking cessation rates. In 143 participants randomized in phase 2, we tested whether feedback on smoking-related biomarkers would reduce 6-month self-reported number of cigarettes smoked per day compared with a no feedback control. Chi-square test and mixed effects repeated measures analyses were used to evaluate group differences.

Results

Participants were 62.5 ± 5.6 (mean ± SD) years of age, had a 50.3 ± 21 pack-year smoking history, and were smoking 16.9 ± 9.9 cigarettes per day. At 8 weeks, there was no difference in quit rates between those randomized to SC plus GFM (n = 15 of 93, 16.1%) and those randomized to SC (n = 16 of 95, 16.8%), with p equals to 0.90. At the 6-month post-randomization follow-up, number of cigarettes smoked per day was similar in the feedback (least-squares mean = 7.5, 95% confidence interval: 6.0–9.1) and no feedback arms (7.7, 95% confidence interval: 6.2–9.3), with p equals to 0.87.

Conclusions

Gain-framed messaging and health feedback did not significantly improve quit rates relative to comprehensive standard of care. Nevertheless, the overall program achieved clinically meaningful smoking quit rates in this older high pack-year cohort, highlighting the importance of intensive tobacco treatment for patients undergoing lung cancer screening.

Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov

NCT02658032.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
1秒前
传奇3应助壮观的斓采纳,获得30
1秒前
李健应助机灵的小蘑菇采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
天天快乐应助火星上梦安采纳,获得30
2秒前
3秒前
JamesPei应助诚心的惜灵采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
和云流彩应助聪慧百招采纳,获得10
3秒前
失眠的大娘完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
学分发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
无花果应助xxxx采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
情怀应助李lll采纳,获得10
6秒前
爆米花应助嘟嘟采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
艺玲发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
饭饭完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
677完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
lyl发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
思源应助MrLi采纳,获得10
12秒前
蒲公英完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
陈陈发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
sunshineboy完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
猪猪呢发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
677发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
读研的栗子完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
DTS发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
标致的乐双应助ccddgg采纳,获得10
16秒前
星河qaq完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
A Case Study on Hotels as Noncongregate Emergency Living Accommodations for Returning Citizens 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7758338
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9304443
关于积分的说明 20280567
捐赠科研通 7342084
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3312169
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2462795
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2326004