Recovering bullying appraisals from retrospective narratives: Agreement of individual human readers, GPT-5, and DeepSeek-V3 with Chinese narrators’ self-reports

心理学 协议 社会心理学 应用心理学 毒物控制 透视图(图形) 感知 发展心理学 度量(数据仓库) 事故(哲学)
作者
Wentao Ge,Yijing Li,Qianqi Wen,Qianyu Zhu,Yan Hu,Benyou Wang
出处
期刊:Computers in human behavior reports [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:24: 101412-101412
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101412
摘要

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated advanced capabilities in processing and interpreting complex human narratives, as well as generating human-like decisions. However, little is known about their ability to approximate narrator-reported appraisals in bullying narratives and their performance compared to individual human readers. This study compares LLMs with individual human readers in recovering narrators’ self-reported bullying appraisals. We designed a four-group comparative study involving 1873 Chinese adults (31.55% males). Participants from Group A ( n = 965) served as the narrators who provided first-person accounts of bullying experiences and self-reports of appraisals. We evaluated how accurately Group B (individual human readers; n = 908), Group C (GPT-5), and Group D (DeepSeek-V3) reproduced the appraisals, using Group A narrators’ self-reported bullying appraisals as the first-person criterion. Accuracy analyses, paired statistical comparisons, logistic regression, and descriptive comparisons of response distributions were performed. The results indicated that LLMs generally matched or exceeded individual human readers in recovering first-person appraisals of bullying content. GPT-5 also showed partial similarity to Groups A and B in associations between appraisals and defending behavior. Because explicit and implicit appraisal cues were not coded separately, the observed agreement may reflect both extraction of stated information and inference from indirect narrative cues. Severity ratings showed a model-specific pattern: GPT-5 assigned higher severity ratings than individual human readers, whereas DeepSeek-V3 assigned lower and more mid-range severity ratings. Our findings suggested that LLMs may assist with research coding of bullying-related appraisals from retrospective narratives. Further work should examine whether this approach extends beyond the Chinese sample and prompt conditions.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
CodeCraft的应助被Leah采纳,获得10
2秒前
Hello的应助被pp采纳,获得10
2秒前
小七发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
summerymiao完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
吴恒吉完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
多情的一鸣完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
遇橙完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
yyn完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
jiangcheng完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
吃葡萄不吐葡萄皮的应助被cl采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
赘婿的应助被LiKai92采纳,获得30
8秒前
8秒前
隐形曼青的应助被无烦恼采纳,获得10
8秒前
FKHY发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
ghs完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
10秒前
IN发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
10秒前
思源的应助被苦行僧采纳,获得50
10秒前
mz完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
函数完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
shiqi1108发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
脑洞疼的应助被吴咩咩采纳,获得10
12秒前
爽狂果断的洋芋完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
李健的应助被雨jia采纳,获得10
12秒前
shiqi完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
zenmefeishi完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
王威完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
王阳明发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
莫三颜完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
FKHY完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
拉伸高分子熔体中缠结行为的模拟和小角中子散射研究 1080
Encyclopedia of Modern Artificial Intelligence 1000
Особенности технологий и методов информационно-психологических войн СССР с Великобританией и США в период 1939-1953 гг 1000
Analyses de reconnaissances de dettes passées devant les échevins d'Ypres (1249-1291) 600
Cellulose and Cellulose Derivatives: Synthesis, Modification and Applications 600
Experimentelle und numerische Modellierung des dynamischen Trag- und Verformungsverhaltens von hochflexiblen Schutzsystemen gegen Steinschlag 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8147964
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9545817
关于积分的说明 21671517
捐赠科研通 7734888
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3423722
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2548642
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2466658