Prognostic value of systemic hemato-immunological indices in uterine cervical cancer: A systemic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of observational studies

Abstract

Objective

To estimate the prognostic efficacy of several systemic hemato-immunological indices for the treatment of cervical cancer as well as to determine whether the systemic hemato-immunological indices are associated with an increased risk of cervical collision cancer.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted to identify studies that evaluated the prognostic impact of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), thrombocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (TLR), C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in cervical cancer patients. The endpoints were overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) and clinicopathologic parameters. A meta-analysis using random-effect models was performed to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Twenty-two retrospective cohort studies involving 9558 patients were included. Our results show that high NLR, PLR, TLR, and CAR indicated poor prognosis for patients with cervical cancer (HRs = 2.46, 1.88, 3.70, and 3.94, respectively; all P ≤ 0.001). Subgroup analysis suggested that the highest NLR and PLR were more precise biomarkers in patients who were diagnosed with FIGO stage I-III cervical cancer after treatment with chemo-radiotherapy. High TLR and high LMR displayed significant prognostic value in late-FIGO stage III-IV cervical cancer (HRs = 4.33 and 2.032, respectively). Additionally, CAR was associated with poor survival in patients with advanced-FIGO stage cervical cancer and larger tumor size. According to the difference of NLR, the younger (43–51 years old) cervical cancer patients had a tendency of increased collision risk. However, cervical cancer patients in the 52–61 years age group were more vulnerable than their respective counterparts using the pooled estimate for PLR.

Conclusion

Our findings support a prognostic role for elevated CAR and TLR besides that of NLR and PLR in advanced-FIGO stage cervical cancer.