双边主义
多边主义
气候治理
公司治理
全球治理
杠杆(统计)
中国
政治学
执行
国际关系
经济体制
国际贸易
经济地理学
经济
政治
管理
法学
机器学习
计算机科学
标识
DOI:10.1080/23812346.2020.1721230
摘要
International cooperation has played a major role in climate governance. With a particular focus on China, this study develops a comparative framework to understand three pathways to international cooperation on climate change: multilateralism, bilateralism and transnationalism. Drawing on cooperation theory, we compare the three pathways in terms of their leaders, organisations, bargaining process, agreement, and enforcement efforts, and analyse their comparative strengths and limitations. We suggest that, given the ever-increasing difficulties and uncertainty experienced in climate multilateralism, the government should pay more attention to developing climate bilateralism and transnationalism in order to leverage the benefits of international cooperation on climate governance.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI