Glucose challenge test screening for prediabetes and early diabetes

医学 糖尿病前期 糖尿病 接收机工作特性 糖耐量试验 内科学 糖耐量受损 空腹血糖受损 曲线下面积 人口 葡萄糖试验 前瞻性队列研究 2型糖尿病 内分泌学 胰岛素抵抗 环境卫生
作者
Sandra L. Jackson,Sandra E. Safo,Lisa R. Staimez,Darin E. Olson,K.M. Venkat Narayan,Qi Long,Joseph Lipscomb,Mary K. Rhee,Peter W.F. Wilson,Anne Tomolo,Lawrence S. Phillips
出处
期刊:Diabetic Medicine [Wiley]
卷期号:34 (5): 716-724 被引量:24
标识
DOI:10.1111/dme.13270
摘要

Abstract Aims To test the hypothesis that a 50‐g oral glucose challenge test with 1‐h glucose measurement would have superior performance compared with other opportunistic screening methods. Methods In this prospective study in a Veterans Health Administration primary care clinic, the following test performances, measured by area under receiver‐operating characteristic curves, were compared: 50‐g oral glucose challenge test; random glucose; and HbA 1c level, using a 75‐g oral glucose tolerance test as the ‘gold standard’. Results The study population was comprised of 1535 people (mean age 56 years, BMI 30.3 kg/m 2 , 94% men, 74% black). By oral glucose tolerance test criteria, diabetes was present in 10% and high‐risk prediabetes was present in 22% of participants. The plasma glucose challenge test provided area under receiver‐operating characteristic curves of 0.85 (95% CI 0.78–0.91) to detect diabetes and 0.76 (95% CI 0.72–0.80) to detect high‐risk dysglycaemia (diabetes or high‐risk prediabetes), while area under receiver‐operating characteristic curves for the capillary glucose challenge test were 0.82 (95% CI 0.75–0.89) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.69–0.77) for diabetes and high‐risk dysglycaemia, respectively. Random glucose performed less well [plasma: 0.76 (95% CI 0.69–0.82) and 0.66 (95% CI 0.62–0.71), respectively; capillary: 0.72 (95% CI 0.65–0.80) and 0.64 (95% CI 0.59–0.68), respectively], and HbA 1c performed even less well [0.67 (95% CI 0.57–0.76) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.58–0.68), respectively]. The cost of identifying one case of high‐risk dysglycaemia with a plasma glucose challenge test would be $42 from a Veterans Health Administration perspective, and $55 from a US Medicare perspective. Conclusions Glucose challenge test screening, followed, if abnormal, by an oral glucose tolerance test, would be convenient and more accurate than other opportunistic tests. Use of glucose challenge test screening could improve management by permitting earlier therapy.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
小蘑菇应助风笑采纳,获得10
1秒前
NaRaZ发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
无界完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
JamesPei应助丘比采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
zty发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
BIANGOUGOU发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
Kong发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
星辰大海应助wwwewqe采纳,获得10
8秒前
kendall完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
小陈发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
任性的雁枫完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
xinxinxin91发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
Pengm7发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
爱睡觉的cc完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
如意二娘完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
lucky完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
kissinger发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
xinxinxin91完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
科研通AI6.3应助芙芙采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
科研通AI6.1应助lin采纳,获得10
19秒前
小谭完成签到 ,获得积分20
20秒前
风中汽车发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
若朴祭司发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
Akim应助丘比采纳,获得10
24秒前
威武荔枝发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
25秒前
28秒前
懿轩发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
自然馒头完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
NaRaZ完成签到,获得积分20
31秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Applied Min-Max Approach to Missile Guidance and Control 5000
Metallurgy at high pressures and high temperatures 2000
Inorganic Chemistry Eighth Edition 1200
The Organic Chemistry of Biological Pathways Second Edition 1000
Anionic polymerization of acenaphthylene: identification of impurity species formed as by-products 1000
Standards for Molecular Testing for Red Cell, Platelet, and Neutrophil Antigens, 7th edition 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6325350
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8141415
关于积分的说明 17069769
捐赠科研通 5377912
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2854022
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1831679
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1682757