The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Score Rather Than Donor Type Impacts Clinical Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Severe Aplastic Anemia Patients Aged 51–60 Years: A Retrospective Study From the Chinese Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry

Our study includes 103 patients aged between 51 and 60 years who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) from matched sibling donors (MSDs) (n = 36), haploidentical donors (HIDs) (n = 56), and unrelated donors (URDs) (n = 11). Multivariate analysis exploring the relationship between risk factors and survival confirmed that survival outcomes were only independently impacted by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score (ECOG scores ≥2 vs. ECOG scores of 0-1, overall survival [OS] HR: 2.91 [95% CI 1.35-6.27], p = 0.006; failure free survival [FFS] HR: 2.93 [95% CI 1.33-5.88], p = 0.006; graft-versus-host disease-free/relapse-free survival [GRFS] HR: 2.80 [95% CI 1.33-5.88], p = 0.006), while age, specific donor source and hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index (HCT-CI) score did not significantly influence prognosis in this age group. After applying propensity score-matching (PSM) to balance the pretransplant clinical factors between patients with ECOG scores 0-1 cohort and those with ECOG scores ≥2 cohort, poor performance status remains a negative factor for survival outcomes (OS p = 0.04; FFS p = 0.03; GRFS p = 0.03). Further analysis in subgroup patients with HCT-CI scores 0-1 found the retained significance of ECOG score in predicting inferior survival. In conclusion, our results indicate good long-term results of allo-HSCT in elderly SAA adults regardless of donor type. Higher ECOG score is associated with poor post-transplant outcomes and has to be taken into account for patients, even at a low-risk comorbidly burden.