Pharmacological control of opioid-induced pruritus: a quantitative systematic review of randomized trials

作者
F. Kjellberg,Martin R. Tramèr
出处
期刊:European Journal of Anaesthesiology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:18 (6): 346-357 被引量:191
标识
DOI:10.1046/j.0265-0215.2000.00826.x
摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Numerous drugs have been used to prevent or to treat opioid-induced pruritus in the surgical setting. Their relative efficacy is not well understood. METHODS: The methods employed involved the systematic search (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, bibliographies, without language restriction, up to June 2000) for full reports of randomized comparisons of any intervention which is thought to be anti-pruritic (active) compared with placebo or no treatment (control) in surgical (including labour) patients receiving opioids. The number of patients who had no pruritus were analysed using relative risk and number-needed-to-treat with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Twenty-two trials (1477 patients) were analysed. Two trials (66 patients), both with low-dose propofol, were on treatment of established pruritus; propofol had no anti-pruritic effect compared with Intralipid. In prophylaxis trials, the average incidence of pruritus with control was 59% (range, 10% to 100%). Most mu-receptor antagonists were efficacious: intravenous naloxone 0.25-2.4 microg kg-1 h-1, relative risk 2.31 (95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 3.54), number-needed-to-treat to prevent pruritus compared with control 3.5; oral naltrexone 9 mg, relative risk 2.80 (1.35-5.80), number-needed-to-treat 1.7; naltrexone 6 mg was less effective and 3 mg did not work; different intravenous and epidural nalbuphine regimens, relative risk 1.71 (1.12-2.62), number-needed-to-treat 4.2. Intravenous nalmefene 0.5 or 1 mg was not anti-pruritic. Intravenous (but not epidural) droperidol 2.5 mg was efficacious, relative risk, 1.71 (1.28-2.29), number-needed-to-treat 4.9. There was a lack of evidence for any anti-pruritic efficacy with prophylactic propofol, epidural or intrathecal epinephrine, epidural clonidine, epidural prednisone, intravenous ondansetron, or intramuscular hydroxyzine. CONCLUSION: Naloxone, naltrexone, nalbuphine and droperidol are efficacious in the prevention of opioid-induced pruritus; minimal effective doses remain unknown. There is a lack of valid data on the efficacy of interventions for the treatment of established pruritus.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
xdd完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
平常寒烟完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
俊俊完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
文雨完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
Dallas发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Susanx完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
无极微光应助科研老周采纳,获得20
3秒前
终陌发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Chinqi发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
俊秀的发卡完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
xfy1002完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
Xdhcg发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
左转完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
魔幻妖妖完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
WFLLL完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
自然幻竹完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
深井的朵拉完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
温暖焱完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
Onlyxxl完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
x5kyi完成签到,获得积分0
6秒前
7秒前
mimimi发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
张宇鑫发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
舒服的井完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
狄俄尼索斯完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
changying完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
SciGPT应助wangdan采纳,获得10
7秒前
fancy完成签到,获得积分0
8秒前
打打应助畅快纸飞机采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
平淡茈完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
day发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
许七安完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
所所应助砚台采纳,获得10
9秒前
茶颜完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
能干凌瑶完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
DIPPR Project 801 - Full Version 380
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7766283
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9310196
关于积分的说明 20315381
捐赠科研通 7351072
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3315052
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2464580
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2329619