可靠性(半导体)
计算机科学
口腔正畸科
牙合
牙科
可靠性工程
医学
闭塞
工程类
量子力学
物理
功率(物理)
心脏病学
作者
Sarah Qadeer,Mutlu Özcan,Daniel Edelhoff,Hans van Pelt
出处
期刊:PubMed
日期:2021-08-31
卷期号:29 (3): 130-141
被引量:19
标识
DOI:10.1922/ejprd_2202qadeer12
摘要
This literature review summarizes the properties, advantages, limitations, and clinical implications of employing static occlusal indicators compared to quantifiable digital occlusal indicators during occlusal adjustments.An electronic database search of dental literature was carried out in PubMed/MEDLINE using the key words Occlusal Indicators, Occlusal Assessment, Static, Reliability, Dynamic, Repeatability, Validity and Clinical Accuracy. A total of 231 papers were isolated, with 129 papers considered for review.The included papers were grouped by Static and Dynamic Occlusal indicators. The numbers of papers in the Static Group was extremely low (only 20 papers) compared to The Dynamic group (T-Scan: 89; Dental Prescale: 28; Intraoral Scanners:17).Little evidence supports the use of static occlusal indicators due to their high degree of subjectivity required during implementation. However, much scientific evidence supports the use of T-Scan, as it measures relative occlusal forces and timing objectively, accurately, and repeatedly. For the improvement of Occlusal Practice, Subjective Interpretation using Static occlusal indicators should be replaced with digital ones for objective measurements.The computerized occlusal analysis system is well studied and has the capacity to provide precise time and force sequencing information to objectively evaluate occlusal contacts for improved treatment outcome.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI