医学
功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术
外科
鼻息肉
慢性鼻-鼻窦炎
药物治疗
鼻内镜手术
耐火材料(行星科学)
内窥镜检查
哮喘
疾病
窦(植物学)
鼻窦炎
内镜手术
呼吸道疾病
医疗
梅德林
鼻腔
慢性鼻窦炎
内镜治疗
药物治疗
呼吸系统
生物制剂
作者
H Majeethia,Z Mehdi,O G Ahmed,M Takashima,G A Kelley,J Lee,H H Ramadan,C A Makary
摘要
Biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammation, such as dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab, have been developed to manage chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), particularly in patients with comorbid asthma or aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) remains the mainstay of treatment in patients who are refractory to medical therapy (1,2). However, direct comparisons between biologic therapy and FESS are limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare sinonasal outcomes between FESS and biologic therapy in real-world settings.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI