医学
克朗巴赫阿尔法
可靠性(半导体)
组内相关
考试(生物学)
团队合作
医学教育
心理测量学
临床心理学
政治学
量子力学
生物
物理
古生物学
功率(物理)
法学
作者
J. S. Rütherford,Rhona Flin,Amy Irwin,Angus McFadyen
出处
期刊:Anaesthesia
[Wiley]
日期:2015-07-07
卷期号:70 (8): 907-914
被引量:55
摘要
Summary This study tested the reliability, validity and usability of a prototype behavioural rating system for the non‐technical skills of assistants working with the anaesthetist. Anaesthetic nurses and operating department practitioners (n = 48) used the prototype Anaesthetic Non‐technical Skills for Anaesthetic Practitioners ( ANTS ‐ AP ) system to rate the non‐technical skills of anaesthetic assistants in 12 videos of simulated theatre work. Test–retest reliability was assessed with a sub‐sample (n = 12). The skill categories assessed were ‘situation awareness’, ‘teamwork and communication’ and ‘task management’. The internal consistency for the ratings of elements in categories was acceptable (Cronbach's α of 0.78, 0.77 and 0.69, respectively), with more modest inter‐rater reliability (intraclass correlations for categories 0.54, 0.70, 0.86), test–retest reliability (intraclass correlations 0.68, 0.58, 0.38) and accuracy (weighted kappa 0.39). Most participants considered the system complete (n = 42, 87%), the wording clear (n = 48, 100%) and the system useful for structuring observation (n = 48, 100%).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI