系统回顾
医学
过敏
疾病
重症监护医学
梅德林
免疫学
病理
生物
生物化学
作者
Paula Kuper,Claudia Hasenpusch,Simone Proebstl,Uwe Matterne,Catherine J. Hornung,Esther Grätsch,Mengtong Li,Antonia A Sprenger,Dawid Pieper,Jennifer J. Koplin,Michael R. Perkin,Jon Genuneit,Christian Apfelbacher
摘要
Abstract Objective To summarise and critically appraise systematic review (SR) evidence on the effects of timing of complementary feeding (CF) on the occurrence of allergic sensitisation and disease. Design Overview of SRs. AMSTAR‐2 and ROBIS were used to assess methodological quality and risk of bias (RoB) of SRs. RoB 2 Tool was used to assess RoB of primary randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (or extracted). The certainty of evidence (CoE) was assessed using GRADE. Findings were synthesised narratively. Data Sources MEDLINE (via PubMed and Ovid), the Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection (2010 to 27 February 2023). Eligibility Criteria SRs investigating the effects of timing of CF in infants or young children (0–3 years) on risk of developing food allergy (FA), allergic sensitisation, asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic eczema and adverse events based on RCT evidence. Results Eleven SRs were included. Only two SRs had low RoB; common issues were failure to report on funding of primary studies and failure to provide a list of excluded trials. Common limitations of included trials were lack of blinding of outcome assessment or detailed trial preregistration, and inadequate handling of high loss to follow up. Primary study overlap was very high for specific FA and slight to moderate for FA in general and other primary outcomes. Introducing specific foods (peanut, cooked egg) early probably reduces the risk of specific FA. Evidence for other allergic outcomes was mostly very uncertain and based on few primary studies. Trials varied regarding timing of CF, nature of complementary foods and population risk, which limited comparability between SRs. Conclusions For developing guidelines to support decision‐making on the timing of CF as a preventive strategy, early introduction of specific foods (i.e. egg and peanut) seems promising and safe, whereas more extensive research is required regarding other allergic outcomes and potential adverse events.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI