Development and Validation of the Medication Regimen Complexity Index

医学 养生 索引(排版) 复杂性指数 重症监护医学 内科学 医学物理学 万维网 算法 计算机科学 布尔函数
作者
Johnson George,Yee-Teng Phun,Michael Bailey,David C. M. Kong,Kay Stewart
出处
期刊:Annals of Pharmacotherapy [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:38 (9): 1369-1376 被引量:503
标识
DOI:10.1345/aph.1d479
摘要

BACKGROUND: Medication regimen attributes, such as the number of drugs, dosage frequency, administration instructions, and the prescribed dosage forms, have been shown to influence patient outcomes. No single tool for quantifying the complexity of general medication regimens has been published in the medical literature. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a tool to quantify the complexity of prescribed medication regimens. METHODS: Literature findings and the expertise of the authors were used for developing the tool. Eight pharmacy researchers helped in establishing the tool's face and content validity. The new tool was tested on 134 medication regimens from patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Six regimens with a spread of scores on the tool were presented to a 5–member expert panel that subjectively ranked these regimens to confirm the tool's criterion-related validity. The relationships between scores on the tool and various independent variables were tested to judge the tool's construct validity. Two raters scored 25 regimens using the tool to test its inter-rater and test—retest reliabilities. RESULTS: A 65–item Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI) was developed. The expert panel had strong agreement (Kendall's W = 0.8; p = 0.001) on their individual rankings of the 6 regimens. The panel's consensus ranking had perfect correlation with the MRCI ranking. The total MRCI score had significant correlation with the number of drugs in the regimen (Spearman's Rho = 0.9; p < 0.0001), but not with the age and gender of the patients. Inter-rater and test—retest reliabilities for the total score and scores for individual sections on the MRCI were ≥0.9. CONCLUSIONS: The MRCI is a reliable and valid tool for quantifying drug regimen complexity with potential applications in both practice and research.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
hhhhhy完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
惠惠不会完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
喃喃发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Z可完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
SYLH应助clayluo采纳,获得10
2秒前
Funny完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
yx完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
墨殇发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Singularity应助墨菲特采纳,获得10
6秒前
结实的青荷完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
科研通AI5应助八八九九九1采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
寒冷的绿真完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
大大怪发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
oopsabc发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
HongY完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
12秒前
12秒前
LTDs完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
搜集达人应助郭海涛采纳,获得10
13秒前
DC-CIK军团完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
半夏发布了新的文献求助30
14秒前
ZD发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
小马甲应助XT9采纳,获得10
15秒前
woclcom完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
16秒前
17秒前
terryok发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
YY发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
zho应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
19秒前
CipherSage应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
19秒前
我是老大应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
19秒前
高分求助中
Mass producing individuality 600
Algorithmic Mathematics in Machine Learning 500
非光滑分析与控制理论 500
Разработка метода ускоренного контроля качества электрохромных устройств 500
A Combined Chronic Toxicity and Carcinogenicity Study of ε-Polylysine in the Rat 400
Advances in Underwater Acoustics, Structural Acoustics, and Computational Methodologies 300
A warm-up performed with proper-weight sandbags on the leg improves the speed and RPE performance of 100 m sprint in collegiate male sprinters 200
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3826843
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3369113
关于积分的说明 10454281
捐赠科研通 3088663
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1699351
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 817289
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 770157