全氟辛烷
全氟辛酸
雌激素
化学
活力测定
内分泌学
内科学
激素
内分泌系统
内分泌干扰物
体外
生物
生物化学
医学
磺酸盐
有机化学
钠
作者
Pacharapan Sonthithai,Tawit Suriyo,Apinya Thiantanawat,Piyajit Watcharasit,Mathuros Ruchirawat,Jutamaad Satayavivad
摘要
Abstract Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) are the two most popular surfactants among perfluorinated compounds (PFCs), with a wide range of uses. Growing evidence suggests that PFCs have the potential to interfere with estrogen homeostasis, posing a risk of endocrine‐disrupting effects. This in vitro study aimed to investigate the estrogenic effect of these compounds on T47D hormone‐dependent breast cancer cells. PFOS and PFOA (10 −12 to 10 −4 M) were not able to induce estrogen response element (ERE) activation in the ERE luciferase reporter assay. The ERE activation was induced when the cells were co‐incubated with PFOS (10 −10 to 10 −7 M) or PFOA (10 −9 to 10 −7 M) and 1 nM of 17β‐estradiol (E2). PFOS and PFOA did not modulate the expression of estrogen‐responsive genes, including progesterone ( PR ) and trefoil factor ( pS2 ), but these compounds enhanced the effect of E2‐induced pS2 gene expression. Neither PFOS nor PFOA affected T47D cell viability at any of the tested concentrations. In contrast, co‐exposure with PFOS or PFOA and E2 resulted in an increase of E2‐induced cell viability, but no effect was found with 10 ng ml −1 EGF co‐exposure. Both compounds also intensified E2‐dependent growth in the proliferation assay. ERK1/2 phosphorylation was increased by co‐exposure with PFOS or PFOA and E2, but not with EGF. Collectively, this study shows that PFOS and PFOA did not possess estrogenic activity, but they enhanced the effects of E2 on estrogen‐responsive gene expression, ERK1/2 activation and the growth of the hormone‐deprived T47D cells. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI