A validation study of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking with a sample of Korean elementary school students

陶伦斯创意思维测验 心理学 创造力 流利 判别效度 独创性 考试(生物学) 收敛有效性 验证性因素分析 认知 发展心理学 心理测量学 数学教育 结构方程建模 社会心理学 数学 古生物学 生物 统计 神经科学 内部一致性
作者
Chohee Yoon
出处
期刊:Thinking Skills and Creativity [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:26: 38-50 被引量:47
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2017.05.004
摘要

This study aimed to examine the convergent/discriminant and construct validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT)–Figural Form, which is one of the most widely used tests for measuring creativity nowadays. A total of 204 Korean elementary school students participated in the study. It first examined the convergent validity among the Figural TTCT–Form A, the Test of Creative Problem Solving in Science (TCPSS), and the Creative Personality Scale (CPS), using correlational and factor analytic techniques. Science-related attitude tests were included to examine the discriminant validity of the TTCT. The findings of the correlational analysis showed that correlations varied depending on the subscale of the TTCT. Originality and fluency, which are the core elements of divergent thinking, had no significant or even negative correlations with subscale scores from the TCPSS and CPS, implying that these creativity tests measure different constructs. A principal components analysis of the subscale scores of these measures resulted in five factors (creative personality, science attitude, creative problem solving, and two different cognitive functions from the TTCT), indicating that the constructs these tests attempted to measure were distinct from each other. In addition, the TTCT has been shown to represent two different cognitive functions: innovative creativity (indicated by originality and fluency) and adaptive creativity (related to abstractness of titles, elaboration, and resistance to premature closure). Lastly, the results of the principal components analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using the 11 subtask scores from the Figural TTCT showed that both cognitive and task factors explained the variance in scores. This finding indicates that the TTCT scores do not represent the theoretical structure the test developers originally intended and implies the need to reconsider the nature of the TTCT and its usability for measurement and educational purposes.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
1823323145发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
tpp发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
如流沙cf发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Lumoon完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
搬运工完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
yx完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
crazyfish完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
orixero应助王开放采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
james发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
chen555发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
在水一方应助搬运工采纳,获得10
12秒前
xu完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
英俊鼠标完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
科研通AI6.4应助xcx采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
16秒前
16秒前
17秒前
闪闪航空发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
天天快乐应助七七采纳,获得10
17秒前
RadioMars应助zzzweb采纳,获得10
18秒前
bkagyin应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
洛廖琉应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
烟花应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
Owen应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
18秒前
18秒前
秋风应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
lyudmila完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
FashionBoy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
19秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
19秒前
xcx完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
PGONE完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
HYDROLYSE ACIDE DE QUELQUES DIOXASPIROCYCLANES 1314
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7748386
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9296481
关于积分的说明 20235128
捐赠科研通 7329594
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3308782
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2460546
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2320874