心理学
判别效度
收敛有效性
比例(比率)
可靠性(半导体)
精神病理学
临床心理学
心理测量学
内部一致性
功率(物理)
物理
量子力学
作者
Johan Bjureberg,Brjánn Ljótsson,Matthew T. Tull,Erik Hedman,Hanna Sahlin,Lars‐Gunnar Lundh,Jonas Bjärehed,David DiLillo,Terri L. Messman‐Moore,Clara Hellner Gumpert,Kim L. Gratz
标识
DOI:10.1007/s10862-015-9514-x
摘要
The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) is a widely-used, theoretically-driven, and psychometrically-sound self-report measure of emotion regulation difficulties. However, at 36-items, the DERS may be challenging to administer in some situations or settings (e.g., in the course of patient care or large-scale epidemiological studies). Consequently, there is a need for a briefer version of the DERS. The goal of the present studies was to develop and evaluate a 16-item version of the DERS – the DERS-16. The reliability and validity of the DERS-16 were examined in a clinical sample (N = 96) and two large community samples (Ns = 102 and 482). The validity of the DERS-16 was evaluated comparing the relative strength of the association of the two versions of the DERS with measures of emotion regulation and related constructs, psychopathology, and clinically-relevant behaviors theorized to stem from emotion regulation deficits. Results demonstrate that the DERS-16 has retained excellent internal consistency, good test-retest reliability, and good convergent and discriminant validity. Further, the DERS-16 showed minimal differences in its convergent and discriminant validity with relevant measures when compared to the original DERS. In conclusion, the DERS-16 offers a valid and brief method for the assessment of overall emotion regulation difficulties.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI