定性比较分析
社会学
比较研究
定性研究
桥(图论)
社会科学
实证研究
模糊集
计算机科学
认识论
模糊逻辑
人工智能
哲学
医学
机器学习
内科学
标识
DOI:10.1080/13645579.2013.762611
摘要
Book Review of: Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: a guide to qualitative comparative
analysis, by C. Q. Schneider and C. Wagemann, Cambridge, Cambridge University
Press, 2012, 367 pp., £60.00 (hardback), ISBN 978-1-107-01352-0, £23.99
(paperback), ISBN 978-1-107-60113-0.
Since its launch in 1987 by Ragin as a methodology intended to bridge the gap
between quantitative variable-based and qualitative case-based research approaches,
social science researchers have increasingly turned to Qualitative Comparative Analysis
(QCA) for conducting comparative empirical social science research. Throughout
the years, QCA has become an umbrella term for a set-theoretic configurational
research approach encompassing a number of variants and techniques for systematically
comparing cases (Rihoux & Ragin, 2009). This textbook by Schneider and
Wagemann is ‘dedicated to explaining QCA’ (p. 9), where the ‘focus will be more
on the technical aspects’ (p. 11). They concentrate on the most popular variants:
crisp sets (csQCA) and fuzzy sets (fsQCA). The book is aimed ‘to cater to both
beginners and very advanced readers’ (p. 19).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI