医学
胃切除术
危险系数
临床终点
内科学
化疗
癌症
随机对照试验
淋巴结切除术
外科肿瘤学
顺铂
肿瘤科
胃肠病学
外科
置信区间
作者
Yoshiaki Iwasaki,Masanori Terashima,Junki Mizusawa,Hiroshi Katayama,Kenichi Nakamura,Hitoshi Katai,Takaki Yoshikawa,Seiji Ito,Masahide Kaji,Yutaka Kimura,Motohiro Hirao,Makoto Yamada,Akira Kurita,Masakazu Takagi,Sang‐Woong Lee,Akinori Takagane,Hiroshi Yabusaki,Jun Hihara,Narikazu Boku,Takeshi Sano
出处
期刊:Gastric Cancer
[Springer Science+Business Media]
日期:2020-11-16
卷期号:24 (2): 492-502
被引量:159
标识
DOI:10.1007/s10120-020-01136-7
摘要
Specific treatment strategies are sorely needed for scirrhous-type gastric cancer still, which has poor prognosis. Based on the promising results of our previous phase II study (JCOG0210), we initiated a phase III study to confirm the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in type 4 or large type 3 gastric cancer.Patients aged 20-75 years without a macroscopic unresectable factor as confirmed via staging laparoscopy were randomly assigned to surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (Arm A) or NAC (S-1plus cisplatin) followed by D2 gastrectomy plus adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (Arm B). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).Between October 2005 and July 2013, 316 patients were enrolled, allocating 158 patients to each arm. In Arm B, in which NAC was completed in 88% of patients. Significant downstaging based on tumor depth, lymph node metastasis, and peritoneal cytology was observed using NAC. Excluding the initial 16 patients randomized before the first revision of the protocol, 149 and 151 patients in arms A and B, respectively, were included in the primary analysis. The 3-year OS rates were 62.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 54.1-69.6] in Arm A and 60.9% (95% CI 52.7-68.2) in Arm B. The hazard ratio of Arm B against Arm A was 0.916 (95% CI 0.679-1.236).For type 4 or large type 3 gastric cancer, NAC with S-1 plus cisplatin failed to demonstrate a survival benefit. D2 surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy remains the standard treatment.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI