Comparison of deep learning-based emission-only attenuation correction methods for positron emission tomography

衰减校正 衰减 正电子发射断层摄影术 卷积神经网络 核医学 人工智能 计算机科学 相似性(几何) 人工神经网络 模式识别(心理学) 卷积(计算机科学) 迭代重建 物理 光学 医学 图像(数学)
作者
Donghwi Hwang,Seung Kwan Kang,Kyeong Yun Kim,Hongyoon Choi,Jae Sung Lee
出处
期刊:European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging [Springer Science+Business Media]
卷期号:49 (6): 1833-1842 被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00259-021-05637-0
摘要

PurposeThis study aims to compare two approaches using only emission PET data and a convolution neural network (CNN) to correct the attenuation (μ) of the annihilation photons in PET.MethodsOne of the approaches uses a CNN to generate μ-maps from the non-attenuation-corrected (NAC) PET images (μ-CNNNAC). In the other method, CNN is used to improve the accuracy of μ-maps generated using maximum likelihood estimation of activity and attenuation (MLAA) reconstruction (μ-CNNMLAA). We investigated the improvement in the CNN performance by combining the two methods (μ-CNNMLAA+NAC) and the suitability of μ-CNNNAC for providing the scatter distribution required for MLAA reconstruction. Image data from 18F-FDG (n = 100) or 68 Ga-DOTATOC (n = 50) PET/CT scans were used for neural network training and testing.ResultsThe error of the attenuation correction factors estimated using μ-CT and μ-CNNNAC was over 7%, but that of scatter estimates was only 2.5%, indicating the validity of the scatter estimation from μ-CNNNAC. However, CNNNAC provided less accurate bone structures in the μ-maps, while the best results in recovering the fine bone structures were obtained by applying CNNMLAA+NAC. Additionally, the μ-values in the lungs were overestimated by CNNNAC. Activity images (λ) corrected for attenuation using μ-CNNMLAA and μ-CNNMLAA+NAC were superior to those corrected using μ-CNNNAC, in terms of their similarity to λ-CT. However, the improvement in the similarity with λ-CT by combining the CNNNAC and CNNMLAA approaches was insignificant (percent error for lung cancer lesions, λ-CNNNAC = 5.45% ± 7.88%; λ-CNNMLAA = 1.21% ± 5.74%; λ-CNNMLAA+NAC = 1.91% ± 4.78%; percent error for bone cancer lesions, λ-CNNNAC = 1.37% ± 5.16%; λ-CNNMLAA = 0.23% ± 3.81%; λ-CNNMLAA+NAC = 0.05% ± 3.49%).ConclusionThe use of CNNNAC was feasible for scatter estimation to address the chicken-egg dilemma in MLAA reconstruction, but CNNMLAA outperformed CNNNAC.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
研友_Z63kg8发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
嘻嘻完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
海绵宝宝发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
koui发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Hello应助kendrick677采纳,获得10
2秒前
潇潇完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
科研通AI6.4应助3232采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
小鹿5460应助quxiaofei采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
kklove应助YY采纳,获得10
5秒前
NianWang发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
仰望完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
完美茉莉发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
6秒前
孙晓晓发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
无情麦片发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
CipherSage应助薛西采纳,获得10
7秒前
nihao完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
风中墨镜发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
ding应助研友_Z63kg8采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
不语完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
研友_Zr2W7Z发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Wolfram发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
杜智敏发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
molihuakai应助松尐采纳,获得10
9秒前
左左蕊完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
高山和鸟完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
王梓磬发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
楽优完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
CipherSage应助巫雍采纳,获得10
11秒前
高分求助中
Overcoming Stigma and Bias in Obesity Management 800
Malcolm Fraser : a biography 700
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Materials selection in mechanical design 500
Bounds for Statistical Estimation in Semiparametric Models 500
Climate change and sports: Statistics report on climate change and sports 500
Forced degradation and stability indicating LC method for Letrozole: A stress testing guide 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6477684
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8279440
关于积分的说明 17657587
捐赠科研通 5559812
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2910902
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1887873
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1741389