Efficacy of catheter-based renal denervation in the absence of antihypertensive medications (SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Pivotal): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial

医学 血压 去神经支配 随机对照试验 导管 临床试验 内科学 麻醉 外科
作者
Michael Böhm,Kazuomi Kario,David E. Kandzari,Felix Mahfoud,Michael A. Weber,Roland E. Schmieder,Konstantinos Tsioufis,Stuart Pocock,Dimitris Konstantinidis,James W. Choi,Cara East,David P. Lee,Adrian Ma,Sebastian Ewen,Debbie L. Cohen,Robert Wilensky,Chandan Devireddy,Janice P. Lea,Axel Schmid,Joachim Weil
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:395 (10234): 1444-1451 被引量:588
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30554-7
摘要

Catheter-based renal denervation has significantly reduced blood pressure in previous studies. Following a positive pilot trial, the SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED (SPYRAL Pivotal) trial was designed to assess the efficacy of renal denervation in the absence of antihypertensive medications.In this international, prospective, single-blinded, sham-controlled trial, done at 44 study sites in Australia, Austria, Canada, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Japan, the UK, and the USA, hypertensive patients with office systolic blood pressure of 150 mm Hg to less than 180 mm Hg were randomly assigned 1:1 to either a renal denervation or sham procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was baseline-adjusted change in 24-h systolic blood pressure and the secondary efficacy endpoint was baseline-adjusted change in office systolic blood pressure from baseline to 3 months after the procedure. We used a Bayesian design with an informative prior, so the primary analysis combines evidence from the pilot and Pivotal trials. The primary efficacy and safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02439749.From June 25, 2015, to Oct 15, 2019, 331 patients were randomly assigned to either renal denervation (n=166) or a sham procedure (n=165). The primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were met, with posterior probability of superiority more than 0·999 for both. The treatment difference between the two groups for 24-h systolic blood pressure was -3·9 mm Hg (Bayesian 95% credible interval -6·2 to -1·6) and for office systolic blood pressure the difference was -6·5 mm Hg (-9·6 to -3·5). No major device-related or procedural-related safety events occurred up to 3 months.SPYRAL Pivotal showed the superiority of catheter-based renal denervation compared with a sham procedure to safely lower blood pressure in the absence of antihypertensive medications.Medtronic.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
wi完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
Akim应助古灵井盖采纳,获得30
2秒前
2秒前
Dean应助支雨泽采纳,获得200
3秒前
3秒前
zack6119发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
554100发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
共享精神应助一只小胶质采纳,获得10
5秒前
小二郎应助黄梓涵采纳,获得10
6秒前
亦何发布了新的文献求助40
6秒前
佳子发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
皆非i完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
Orange应助666采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
小二郎应助悦耳灰狼采纳,获得10
7秒前
大个应助徐畅采纳,获得10
7秒前
蝴蝶兰完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
VirSnorlax完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
小Q发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
糖糖完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
Kaylaa完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Nole应助haita采纳,获得10
9秒前
手抓饼啊发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
lzy发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
科研王完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
侯安琪完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
orixero应助吴妮妮采纳,获得10
10秒前
科研通AI6.4应助VAN喵采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
单薄访琴发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
bubble发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
佳子完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
开心的吗喽完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
贴贴完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
2016 Venous Blood Study (VBS) (Final V3.0) 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
核安全综合知识2024版 500
Photothermal Science and Techniques 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7704432
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9262450
关于积分的说明 20037253
捐赠科研通 7279995
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3294952
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2450112
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2301669