医学
物理疗法
颈部疼痛
奇纳
随机对照试验
心理信息
荟萃分析
梅德林
慢性疼痛
心理干预
科克伦图书馆
认知
认知行为疗法
认知疗法
物理医学与康复
内科学
替代医学
精神科
病理
政治学
法学
作者
Laura G. W. Cox,Dawson J. Kidgell,Ross Iles
标识
DOI:10.1080/10833196.2019.1664081
摘要
Background: Neck pain has been estimated to affect one in two people. Cognitive therapy and neck-specific strengthening exercises are two interventions that target different factors related to chronic neck pain in order to decrease pain and disability.Objectives: To critically appraise the effect of a combination of neck-specific strengthening exercises and cognitive therapy compared to the individual therapies on pain and disability in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain.Methods: A systematic search of the five following online databases was undertaken from inception up to April 2017: Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE + EMBASE Classic, CINAHL, and PEDro. Key inclusion criteria were as follows: randomized control trials published in English, participants with chronic neck pain (greater than three months), an intervention of cognitive therapy and neck-specific strengthening exercise, and an outcome measure of pain and/or disability.Results: Seven randomized control trials met inclusion criteria, and five were included in meta-analysis. The studies were of a low-to-moderate methodological quality. Evidence was found for the effectiveness of neck-specific strengthening exercises (SMD 0.30, 95%CI 0.09 to 0.52, p = .005) and a combination of cognitive therapy and neck-specific strengthening exercise (SMD 0.50, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.71, p < .0001) in reducing pain and disability compared to a control of prescribed physical activity. The combination of cognitive therapy and neck-specific strengthening exercises was not found to be more effective at reducing pain and disability than neck-specific strengthening exercises alone (SMD 0.22, 95%CI −0.01 to 0.45, p = .06) or cognitive therapy alone (SMD 0.26, 95%CI −0.33 to 0.86, p = .39).Conclusions: The effects of both neck-specific exercises and cognitive therapy observed in this review are statistically significant; however, it is questionable whether they are clinically significant based on the measures used.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI