边缘型人格障碍
临床心理学
背景(考古学)
人格障碍
生活质量(医疗保健)
人格
精神科
心理学
医学
心理治疗师
社会心理学
生物
古生物学
作者
Josephine Giesen‐Bloo,Richard van Dyck,Philip Spinhoven,W. van Tilburg,Carmen D. Dirksen,Antoinette D. I. van Asselt,Ismay Kremers,Marjon Nadort,Arnoud Arntz
标识
DOI:10.1001/archpsyc.63.6.649
摘要
Context
Borderline personality disorder is a severe and chronic psychiatric condition, prevalent throughout health care settings. Only limited effects of current treatments have been documented. Objective
To compare the effectiveness of schema-focused therapy (SFT) and psychodynamically based transference-focused psychotherapy (TFP) in patients with borderline personality disorder. Design
A multicenter, randomized, 2-group design. Setting
Four general community mental health centers. Participants
Eighty-eight patients with a Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index, fourth version, score greater than a predetermined cutoff score. Intervention
Three years of either SFT or TFP with sessions twice a week. Main Outcome Measures
Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index, fourth version, score; quality of life; general psychopathologic dysfunction; and measures of SFT/TFP personality concepts. Patient assessments were made before randomization and then every 3 months for 3 years. Results
Data on 44 SFT patients and 42 TFP patients were available. The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the groups were similar at baseline. Survival analyses revealed a higher dropout risk for TFP patients than for SFT patients (P = .01). Using an intention-to-treat approach, statistically and clinically significant improvements were found for both treatments on all measures after 1-, 2-, and 3-year treatment periods. After 3 years of treatment, survival analyses demonstrated that significantly more SFT patients recovered (relative risk = 2.18;P = .04) or showed reliable clinical improvement (relative risk = 2.33;P = .009) on the Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index, fourth version. Robust analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) showed that they also improved more in general psychopathologic dysfunction and measures of SFT/TFP personality concepts (P<.001). Finally, SFT patients showed greater increases in quality of life than TFP patients (robust ANCOVAs,P=.03 andP<.001). Conclusions
Three years of SFT or TFP proved to be effective in reducing borderline personality disorder–specific and general psychopathologic dysfunction and measures of SFT/TFP concepts and in improving quality of life; SFT is more effective than TFP for all measures.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI