医院焦虑抑郁量表
慢性阻塞性肺病
肺病
焦虑
医学
萧条(经济学)
物理疗法
系统回顾
比例(比率)
临床心理学
心理学
心理测量学
精神科
梅德林
内科学
经济
法学
宏观经济学
物理
量子力学
政治学
作者
Aleksandra Nikolovski,Lara Gamgoum,Arshpreet Deol,Shea Quilichini,Ethan Kazemir,Jonathan Rhodenizer,Ana Oliveira,Dina Brooks,Sanaa Alsubheen
标识
DOI:10.1080/09638288.2023.2182918
摘要
PURPOSE: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is used to assess anxiety and depression in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, its measurement properties lack critical appraisal. We aimed to summarize and critically appraise the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the HADS in COPD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five electronic databases were searched. The Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines were used to assess the methodological and evidence quality in the selected studies. RESULTS: Twelve studies assessed the psychometric properties of the HADS-Total and its subscales HADS-Anxiety and HADS-Depression in COPD. High-quality evidence supported the structural and criterion validity of the HADS-A, the internal consistency of the HADS-T, HADS-A, and HADS-D with Cronbach's alpha values of 0.73-0.87, and before-after treatment responsiveness of HADS-T and its subscales (minimal clinically important difference = 1.4-2; effect size = 0.45-1.40). Moderate-quality evidence supported the test-retest reliability of the HADS-A and HADS-D with excellent coefficient values of 0.86-0.90. CONCLUSIONS: The HADS-A is recommended for use in individuals with stable COPD. The lack of high-quality evidence on the validity of the HADS-D and HADS-T prevented drawing robust conclusions about their clinical utility in COPD.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI