制作
材料科学
背景(考古学)
限制
纳米技术
锂(药物)
电极
快速成型
导电体
工艺工程
过程(计算)
3D打印
计算机科学
机械工程
复合材料
工程类
医学
古生物学
化学
替代医学
物理化学
病理
生物
内分泌学
操作系统
作者
Sergio Pinilla,Seán Ryan,Lorcan McKeon,Meiying Lian,Sébastien Vaesen,Ahin Roy,Wolfgang Schmitt,Jonathan N. Coleman,Valeria Nicolosi
标识
DOI:10.1002/aenm.202203747
摘要
Abstract Additive manufacturing strategies are gaining more importance in the context of lithium‐ion batteries. The rapid prototyping, reduced waste and complex 3D structures achievable are powerful and attractive tools that are out of the reach of current fabrication techniques. Additionally, thanks to the potential that these manufacturing techniques hold for the fabrication of micro‐energy storage devices, they are gaining increasing attention in the literature. Here, some of the more common additive manufacturing techniques are compared to standard methodologies by systematically evaluating their electrochemical performance and correlating it with the physical changes induced by the printing process. By using LTO/CNT‐based inks, it is observed that the inner arrangement of the conductive additive is significatively altered depending on the technique used and that this has an impact on the rate performance of the device. By using a model that links the capacity‐rate data to the physical properties of the batteries, it is possible to find the limiting factor on the printed electrodes and correlate it with the material arrangement that each technique produces.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI