医学
内科学
淋巴血管侵犯
阶段(地层学)
肿瘤科
佐剂
宫颈癌
荟萃分析
放射治疗
辅助治疗
癌症
外科
转移
生物
古生物学
作者
Pedro Henrique Costa Matos da Silva,Gabriela Oliveira Gonçalves Molino,Maírla Marina Ferreira Dias,Ana Gabriela Alves Pereira,Nicole dos Santos Pimenta,Deivyd Vieira Silva Cavalcante,Ana Clara Felix de Farias Santos,Sarah Hasimyan Ferreira,Rodrigo da Silva Santos,Ângela Adamski da Silva Reis
摘要
Background: The risk of recurrence of early-stage cervical cancer (CC) is associated with prognostic factors such as tumor size, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and deep stromal invasion (DSI). However, the adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy (RT) following surgery to reduce the risk of recurrence in “intermediate risk” remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate the role of adjuvant RT in the recurrence and identify prognostic factors. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify studies comparing adjuvant RT versus no adjuvant treatment in early-stage CC patients with intermediate-risk factors defined by GOG-92 criteria. Outcomes were recurrence, local recurrence, death, 5-year overall survival (5y-OS), and 5-year disease-free survival (5y-DFS). Tumor size ≥ 4 cm, LVSI, and DSI were also evaluated as prognostic factors for recurrence. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 7.2.0. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. Results: A total of 1504 patients from nine studies were included; only one study was a randomized controlled trial, while the others were retrospective cohorts. Adjuvant RT was used to treat 781 patients (52%). Median follow-up ranged from 48 to 120 months. Recurrence (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.38–1.46; p = 0.39), local recurrence (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.44–1.20; p = 0.22), death (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.52–1.80; p = 0.91), 5y-OS (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.36–4.18; p = 0.75), and 5y-DFS (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.42–1.43 p = 0.42) revealed no statistically significant differences between adjuvant RT and observation groups. TS ≥ 4 cm was an independent prognostic risk factor for recurrence (HR 1.83; 95% CI 1.12–2.97; p = 0.02). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that adjuvant RT does not reduce recurrence risk in early-stage cervical cancer. Consider TS ≥ 4 cm as a significant prognostic factor for recurrence. Adjuvant RT in intermediate-risk patients should be considered with caution due the lack of significant improvement in recurrence until the CERVANTES and GOG-0263 trial results become available.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI