随机对照试验
萧条(经济学)
心理学
精神科
临床心理学
心理治疗师
医学
内科学
宏观经济学
经济
作者
David Plevin,Elizabeth Thomas,Lisa Hahn,Scott R. Clark,Leo Chen
标识
DOI:10.1080/15622975.2025.2468240
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Our group conducted a single-blind, controlled, multi-site trial, wherein participants with treatment-resistant depression were randomised to standard 10 Hz rTMS, applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), or accelerated bilateral TBS (aBLTBS), applied sequentially to the right then left DLPFC. We present a secondary analysis of this trial, investigating clinical predictors for treatment response. METHODS: Logistic regression analysis explored the relationship between TMS response and, adjusted for baseline depressive symptom severity: suicidality, current episode duration, age, sex, and presence of melancholia and psychosis. The relationship between self-reported past ECT response and current rTMS treatment response was evaluated with McNemar's test. RESULTS: = 0.2870). No other differential response predictors were identified. CONCLUSIONS: There are no clinically significant differential response predictors to standard rTMS or accelerated TBS treatment protocols. Accelerated TBS or standard rTMS may be effective in treatment-resistant depression, including in patients with previous ECT non-response, and psychosis may lower the odds of treatment response. Given the overall time efficiency in delivering accelerated TBS, this may further strengthen the argument for its broader clinical adoption.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI