母乳喂养
观察研究
政府(语言学)
多样性(政治)
医学
政治学
地理
业务
家庭医学
环境卫生
儿科
病理
哲学
语言学
法学
作者
Linda P. Siziba,Sebastián Huhn,Elisabeth Pütz,Caroline Baier,Raphael S. Peter,Corinna Gebauer,Samantha Griffin,Sophie Wedekind,Natalie Shenker,Jon Genuneit
标识
DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2022-324499
摘要
Background The provision of donor human milk (DHM) through human milk banks is now widely practised globally. The study aimed to describe the current state, identify major topics and map out the emerging trends in human milk banking. Methods PubMed was systematically searched for publications related to DHM, with the last update on 14 May 2021, for papers published between 1946 and 2021. Titles and abstracts were screened and indexed into 8 main and 39 subcategories. A top-up search was done in April 2022, but these results have not been incorporated. Results A total of 1083 publications were identified, and more than a third (41%) were either observational or interventional studies. Predominant topics were milk type and milk composition. Almost half (49%) of the publications in the last decade were funded through government/research councils, and industry funding started shortly after links between formula and necrotising enterocolitis were published. Literature from high-income countries was six times more than publications from low-income or middle-income countries (LMICs). Conclusion The diversity and trends of publications included in this scoping review ranged from descriptive studies comparing biological and compositional differences of mother’s own milk, DHM and/or formula. Very few studies have investigated associations of different milk types with infant outcomes. Evidence on breastfeeding and recipient psychological health outcomes is limited. Further research should identify the appropriateness of different funding sources. Future collaborations between academics, clinicians and milk banks in LMICs should be fostered to bridge the gap that exists between DHM and access.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI