Exercise-based rehabilitation for heart failure: Cochrane systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis

医学 康复 物理疗法 随机对照试验 荟萃分析 心理信息 置信区间 心力衰竭 梅德林 相对风险 系统回顾 临床试验 急诊医学 重症监护医学 物理医学与康复 风险评估 心肌梗塞 日常生活活动 分级(工程) 心脏病
作者
RS Taylor (7488422),L Long (13399383),IR Mordi (7739357),MT Madsen (21907769),EJ Davies (21864155),H Dalal (13399341),K Rees (11991815),SJ Singh (7283309),C Gluud (7778951),AD Zwisler (21907772)
出处
期刊:La Trobe University - OPAL (Open@LaTrobe)
摘要

Objectives: This study performed a contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ExCR) for heart failure (HF). Background: There is an increasing call for trials of models of ExCR for patients with HF that provide alternatives to conventional center-based provision and recruitment of patients that reflect a broader HF population. Methods: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases were searched between January 2013 and January 2018. Randomized trials comparing patients undergoing ExCR to control patients not undergoing exercise were included. Study outcomes were pooled using meta-analysis. Metaregression examined potential effect modification according to ExCR program characteristics, and risk of bias, trial sequential analysis (TSA), and Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) were applied. Results: Across 44 trials (n = 5,783; median follow-up of 6 months), compared with control subjects, ExCR did not reduce the risk of all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR]: 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66 to 1.21; TSA-adjusted CI: 0.26 to 3.10) but did reduce all-cause hospitalization (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.60 to 0.83; TSA-adjusted CI: 0.54 to 0.92) and HF-specific hospitalization (RR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.84; TSA-adjusted CI: 0.14 for 2.46), and patients reported improved Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire overall scores (mean difference: −7.1; 95% CI: −10.5 to −3.7; TSA-adjusted CI: −13.2 to −1.0). No evidence of differential effects across different models of delivery, including center- versus home-based programs, were found. Conclusions: This review supports the beneficial effects of ExCR on patient outcomes. These benefits appear to be consistent across ExCR program characteristics. GRADE and TSA assessments indicated that further high-quality randomized trials are needed.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
葛葛巫发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
tx的应助被111采纳,获得10
1秒前
在水一方的应助被lwqz_2022采纳,获得10
1秒前
共享精神的应助被icecranberry采纳,获得10
2秒前
海豚彦彦完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
WAHAHAoo完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被冬晓采纳,获得10
5秒前
hehe发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
闪闪香魔的应助被张先生采纳,获得10
5秒前
雪芽完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Orange的应助被于晴采纳,获得30
6秒前
苗笑卉完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
高高的冷玉完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
陈思文完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
领导范儿的应助被月九采纳,获得10
9秒前
露露发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
dd发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
科研助理795的应助被丸子采纳,获得10
11秒前
英俊的铭的应助被丸子采纳,获得10
12秒前
葛葛巫完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
gg发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
华仔的应助被高兴的万宝路采纳,获得10
13秒前
hhhh完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被清秀送终采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
茉云发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
Arzal完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
璐辰夕完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
端庄千山完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
桐桐的应助被sunsnow采纳,获得10
17秒前
icecranberry发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe (GGB), Band 5: Pro–Soz 300
Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart (RGG), 4. Auflage, Band 7: R–S 300
Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart (RGG), 4. Auflage, Band 1: A–B 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 内科学 物理 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 复合材料 光电子学 细胞生物学 心理学 量子力学 催化作用 物理化学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7793965
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9330353
关于积分的说明 20436921
捐赠科研通 7383904
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3324235
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2471930
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2341292