Comparative performance of artificial intelligence models in intensive care nursing questions: an evaluation of ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and Google Gemini

重症监护 观察研究 集合(抽象数据类型) 考试(生物学) 护理 护理部 护理最小数据集 计算机科学 护理结果分类 人工智能 生成语法 显著性差异 数据收集 统计分析 医学 梅德林 危重护理 统计假设检验 数据集 心理学 护士教育 数据科学 病人护理
作者
Seçil Gülhan Güner,Ziya Tan,Serhat GÜLPINAR
出处
期刊:BMC Nursing [BioMed Central]
卷期号:25 (1)
标识
DOI:10.1186/s12912-026-04702-z
摘要

BACKGROUND: The complexity and rapidly evolving nature of critical patient care in Intensive Care Units underscore the importance of the accuracy and timeliness of nursing decisions, further highlighting the significance of nursing education. This study aims to examine the accuracy of four generative artificial intelligence tools (ChatGPT 5.0 Plus, ChatGPT 5.0, DeepSeek, and Google Gemini) in answering multiple-choice questions related to the intensive care nursing exam, a fundamental area in nursing education. METHODS: In the study, the ChatGPT 5.0 Plus, ChatGPT 5.0, DeepSeek, and Google Gemini models were evaluated using a test data set consisting of 55 questions. The questions were classified according to their difficulty levels as easy (n = 16), medium (n = 17), and difficult (n = 22). The models' correct response rates and standard or unique correct/incorrect response distributions were examined. Computer-assisted statistical analysis used the Chi-square, one-way ANOVA, and Post-hoc Tukey tests. The study was reported according to STROBE. RESULTS: According to the study results, the success rates of all models were similar for easy and medium-level questions (70-82%), and the difference between them was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Under difficult questions, however, the performance of the models diverged significantly, with Google Gemini achieving the highest success rate at 77.27% and DeepSeek showing the lowest performance at 45.45%. The chi-square analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the correct/incorrect distribution among the models (χ²=3.69; p = 0.296), but at the observational level, Google Gemini had a higher number of unique correct answers (n = 6) compared to the other models. ChatGPT 5.0 was found to have no unique errors. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, while AI models generally showed similar levels of success in intensive care nursing exam questions, Google Gemini demonstrated superior performance in difficult questions, and DeepSeek showed the lowest level of success among the models. The study provides an essential comparative framework regarding the usability of AI-based learning and assessment tools in nursing education. It offers guidance for the future development of AI-based educational technologies. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Gauss的应助被wyrrr采纳,获得30
刚刚
欢喜的溪灵完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
比奇堡恶霸完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
高兴的枕头完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
samantha完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
欻欻欻发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
丘比特的应助被乔婉采纳,获得10
2秒前
华仔的应助被ylf采纳,获得10
2秒前
怕孤独的若云完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
yxy发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
纯真的元风的应助被NeonEchoes采纳,获得20
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
哩厘米完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
坦率的从丹完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
可爱的函函的应助被无名小卒采纳,获得10
4秒前
hanzi完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
5秒前
jia发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
纸飞机发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
sole发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
xm发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
fx的应助被典雅猕猴桃采纳,获得10
7秒前
打打的应助被苹果淇采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
小蘑菇的应助被学术雷锋采纳,获得30
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
Akim的应助被风子采纳,获得10
8秒前
小汤发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
hh发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
NS亦wwt完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Spec 401: Standards for Jet Fuel Facility and Equipment Commissioning and Flushing at Airports, 2026.1 (Original Issue) 1000
Spec 103: Standard for Jet Fuel Quality Control at Airports, Revision 2026.1 1000
Mathematical models in hydrology 1000
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Erzählte Gnade 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8087863
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9501133
关于积分的说明 21424144
捐赠科研通 7659386
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3403799
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2532497
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2442198