Genetic Influence on Family Systems: Implications for Development

作者
David Reiss
出处
期刊:Journal of Marriage and Family [Wiley]
卷期号:57 (3): 543-543 被引量:56
标识
DOI:10.2307/353911
摘要

In this article, my major objective is to describe recently observed connections between genetic processes and family systems. In describing these connections I hope to show how new findings in genetics may give us a clearer idea of the role that families play in the differences among us: differences in healthy and adaptive development and differences in pathological and maladaptive development. I will provide some new data, some of it yet unpublished, from behavioral genetic research. I go somewhat beyond the data currently available, and lay out some very preliminary speculations about genes, families, and development. In doing so, I wish to take advantage of two important trends in the study of human development. The first of these is an increasing emphasis on individual differences in development rather than on stages or transitions in development that are common across individuals. The second trend is increasing attention to biological factors that shape changes in individuals across time and that account for differences in the rates and patterns of change. I will argue here, as have several before me, that a detailed study of family process in relationship to biological factors provides an excellent opportunity to test and revise developmental theories that combine biological and psychosocial data. John Gottman (1994) has pioneered the integration of family process and psychophysiological data. Janice Kielcolt-Glaser has taken the initiative in relating family process and immunological data (Dura & Kielcot-Glaser, 1991). A chapter by Troost and Filsinger (1993) in Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods outlines a number of theories relating evolutionary processes to family process. This essay centers on genetics as a central link between psychosocial and biological modes of thought about development. Certain properties of genes permit powerful research designs and strong inferences about development. First, we know how individuals acquire their genes. This permits us to say, with security, that every child shares exactly 50% of his or her genes with each biological parent, approximately 50% with each sibling, exactly 100% with its identical twin, and approximately 25% with each half sibling. We also know that genes are finite in number. We can search for single genes that have major effects on behavior, the so-called single gene effects. We can also search for sets of genes that collectively produce certain types of behavioral variation, the polygenic effects. Of particular importance, we can ask of any two behaviors--say parenting behavior in a mother and antisocial behavior in her child--whether they are influenced by the same genes or by different genes. Moreover, the pathways by which genes express themselves in behavior are beginning to be mapped out. In this essay I will emphasize one new idea in this domain: Genes influence behavior by influencing an individual's exposure to certain types of environmental experience. For example, we have preliminary evidence that genes influence the level of irritability and anger that adolescents receive from their parents (O'Connor, Hetherington, Reiss, Plomin, in press; Plomin, Reiss, Hetherington, & Howe, 1994). That is, heritable characteristics of adolescents have systematic effects on the negative parenting that they receive from their mothers and fathers. This genetic influence may play an important role in how genes influence differences among adolescents in levels of self-control, self-esteem, and social responsibility. Taken together, these concepts of genetic endowment, discrete genetic effects, and mechanisms of genetic expression open up a new world of questions and powerful research designs for family scholars. It is also important to set aside, at the outset, certain misconceptions about genes. First, genes do not determine behavior; they are not biological juggernauts. The word influence is much more appropriate, considering the many biological and social events that intervene between the structure of genetic DNA and complex human behaviors. …

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
bingle发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
桔汁糖江发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
爱撒娇的蝴蝶完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
风华正茂发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
爆米花应助nonoke采纳,获得10
2秒前
李健的粉丝团团长应助pos采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
爆米花应助快乐的元霜采纳,获得10
4秒前
kk完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
1234发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
ouLniM完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
开朗豪英发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
wenwen流发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
大个应助linda采纳,获得10
7秒前
WXK@945发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
bkagyin应助友好的小翠采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
搜集达人应助Kimmy采纳,获得10
8秒前
上官若男应助Su采纳,获得10
9秒前
Baneyhua发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
ding应助Ann采纳,获得10
9秒前
快毕业吧发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
秋风应助无限的可乐采纳,获得10
10秒前
虚幻的书南完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
潇洒的惋清应助Ww采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
dior完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
A Case Study on Hotels as Noncongregate Emergency Living Accommodations for Returning Citizens 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7756754
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9303194
关于积分的说明 20273053
捐赠科研通 7340166
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3311584
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2462509
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2325196