Efficacy and safety of herbal medicine on dementia and cognitive function: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta‐analysis

医学 痴呆 荟萃分析 认知 传统医学 随机对照试验 梅德林 精神科 内科学 政治学 法学 疾病
作者
Ratree Sawangjit,Chorthip Chuenchom,Thanchanok Sanverm,Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk,Jariya Jiranukool,Rodchares Nithipaijit,Saranrat Sadoyu,Chankiat Phianchana,Peerawat Jinatongthai
出处
期刊:Phytotherapy Research [Wiley]
卷期号:37 (6): 2364-2380 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1002/ptr.7759
摘要

This study aims to summarize the effects of herbs on dementia and assess the strength of evidence. Six international and local databases were searched from inception to October 2021 for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of clinical trials investigated the effects of herbal medicine on dementia or cognitive function. Two researchers independently extracted data, assessed the methodological quality, and rated the credibility of evidence according to established criteria. Thirty-seven articles evaluating 13 herbal medicines were included. Of these, 65% were rated critically low using AMSTAR2. Of 90 unique outcomes, 41 (45.6%) were statistically significant based on random effects model (p ≤ .05). Only 3 herbs were supported by suggestive evidence whereas the others were supported by weak evidence. The suggestive evidence supported benefits of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) plus pharmacotherapy (WMD:1.84; 95% CI: 1.34, 2.35) and Vinpocetine (WMD: -0.94; 95%CI: -1.50, -0.38) on improving cognitive function assessing by Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Syndrom-Kurz-Test, respectively. Moreover, suggestive evidence supported benefit of Huperzia serrata on improving Activities of Daily Living (WMD:-7.18; 95%CI: -9.12, -5.23). No SAE was reported. In conclusion, several herbs were used for improving dementia and cognitive function but recent evidence were limited by the small sample size and poor methodological quality. Therefore, further large and well-designed studies are needed to support the evidence.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
de应助淡水鱼采纳,获得200
刚刚
诸不见发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
斯奈克完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
英俊的铭应助狂啸勇士苏采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
畅快迎荷完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
科研通AI6.2应助yang采纳,获得30
1秒前
2秒前
CYANjane应助羽毛采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
xuan完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
wpp发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
友好的小翠完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
3秒前
Jack完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
zhenggc完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
帅气的高跟鞋完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
司马千筹发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
EF发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
笨蛋发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
Xiong2完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
单复天完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
科研通AI6.2应助现代海采纳,获得10
6秒前
lxk发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
ZR完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
XY发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
CF发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
小白发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
luoxixi完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
jeeya发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助甜心格格采纳,获得10
9秒前
化合物来发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
duduguai完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
dandelion完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7740203
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9288978
关于积分的说明 20193118
捐赠科研通 7318381
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3306404
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2458661
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2316470