Arm Position and Blood Pressure Readings

医学 血压 书桌 体质指数 物理疗法 交叉研究 随机对照试验 舒张期 肥胖 外科 内科学 替代医学 安慰剂 机械工程 工程类 病理
作者
Hairong Liu,Di Zhao,Ahmed Sabit,Chathurangi H Pathiravasan,Junichi Ishigami,Jeanne Charleston,Edgar R. Miller,Kunihiro Matsushita,Lawrence J. Appel,Tammy M. Brady
出处
期刊:JAMA Internal Medicine [American Medical Association]
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5213
摘要

Importance Guidelines for blood pressure (BP) measurement recommend arm support on a desk with the midcuff positioned at heart level. Still, nonstandard positions are used in clinical practice (eg, with arm resting on the lap or unsupported on the side). Objective To determine the effect of different arm positions on BP readings. Design, Setting, and Participants This crossover randomized clinical trial recruited adults between the ages of 18 and 80 years in Baltimore, Maryland, from August 9, 2022, to June 1, 2023. Intervention Participants were randomly assigned to sets of triplicate BP measurements with the arm positioned in 3 ways: (1) supported on a desk (desk 1; reference), (2) hand supported on lap (lap), and (3) arm unsupported at the side (side). To account for intrinsic BP variability, all participants underwent a fourth set of BP measurements with the arm supported on a desk (desk 2). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were the difference in differences in mean systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) between the reference BP (desk 1) and the 2 arm support positions (lap and side): (lap or side − desk 1) − (desk 2 − desk 1). Results were also stratified by hypertensive status, age, obesity status, and access to health care within the past year. Results The trial enrolled 133 participants (mean [SD] age, 57 [17] years; 70 [53%] female); 48 participants (36%) had SBP of 130 mm Hg or higher, and 55 participants (41%) had a body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 30 or higher. Lap and side positions resulted in statistically significant higher BP readings than desk positions, with the difference in differences as follows: lap, SBP Δ 3.9 (95% CI, 2.5-5.2) mm Hg and DBP Δ 4.0 (95% CI, 3.1-5.0) mm Hg; and side, SBP Δ 6.5 (95% CI, 5.1-7.9) mm Hg and DBP Δ 4.4 (95% CI, 3.4-5.4) mm Hg. The patterns were generally consistent across subgroups. Conclusion and Relevance This crossover randomized clinical trial showed that commonly used arm positions (lap or side) resulted in substantial overestimation of BP readings and may lead to misdiagnosis and overestimation of hypertension. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05372328
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
tony完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
QQQQ完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
露卡完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
6秒前
刘刘完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
cai完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
科研通AI5应助黄可以采纳,获得10
10秒前
煜cy发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
香蕉觅云应助cs采纳,获得10
11秒前
zommen完成签到 ,获得积分20
14秒前
SciGPT应助皮皮采纳,获得10
15秒前
ZYH完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
简单喀秋莎完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
冯飞来凯完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
浮华完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
吃点水果保护局完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
sunyafei完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
zommen关注了科研通微信公众号
20秒前
紫禁城的雪花完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
间羟基苄醇完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
ABCDE完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
小章鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
cs发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
24秒前
景清完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
紫禁城的雪天完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
Andy发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
李思超发布了新的文献求助220
33秒前
36秒前
任性的蝴蝶完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
39秒前
Orange应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
39秒前
无花果应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
39秒前
39秒前
上官若男应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
39秒前
李健应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
40秒前
小马甲应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
40秒前
40秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
Encyclopedia of Geology (2nd Edition) 2000
105th Edition CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1600
Maneuvering of a Damaged Navy Combatant 650
Mixing the elements of mass customisation 300
the MD Anderson Surgical Oncology Manual, Seventh Edition 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3778030
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3323705
关于积分的说明 10215513
捐赠科研通 3038914
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1667711
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 798341
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 758339