Diagnostic Strategies for the Assessment of Suspected Stable Coronary Artery Disease

医学 冠状动脉疾病 血运重建 心脏病学 心肌梗塞 内科学 心肌灌注成像 随机对照试验 单光子发射计算机断层摄影术 相对风险 放射科 置信区间
作者
Andrea Zito,Mattía Galli,Giuseppe Biondi‐Zoccai,Antonio Abbate,Pamela S. Douglas,Giuseppe Princi,Domenico D’Amario,Cristina Aurigemma,Enrico Romagnoli,Carlo Trani,Francesco Burzotta
出处
期刊:Annals of Internal Medicine [American College of Physicians]
卷期号:176 (6): 817-826 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.7326/m23-0231
摘要

There is uncertainty about which diagnostic strategy for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) provides better outcomes.To compare the effect on clinical management and subsequent health effects of alternative diagnostic strategies for the initial assessment of suspected stable CAD.PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.Randomized clinical trials comparing diagnostic strategies for CAD detection among patients with symptoms suggestive of stable CAD.Three investigators independently extracted study data.The strongest available evidence was for 3 of the 6 comparisons: coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) versus invasive coronary angiography (ICA) (4 trials), CCTA versus exercise electrocardiography (ECG) (2 trials), and CCTA versus stress single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) (5 trials). Compared with direct ICA referral, CCTA was associated with no difference in cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction (relative risk [RR], 0.84 [95% CI, 0.52 to 1.35]; low certainty) but less index ICA (RR, 0.23 [CI, 0.22 to 0.25]; high certainty) and index revascularization (RR, 0.71 [CI, 0.63 to 0.80]; moderate certainty). Moreover, CCTA was associated with a reduction in cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction compared with exercise ECG (RR, 0.66 [CI, 0.44 to 0.99]; moderate certainty) and SPECT-MPI (RR, 0.64 [CI, 0.45 to 0.90]; high certainty). However, CCTA was associated with more index revascularization (RR, 1.78 [CI, 1.33 to 2.38]; moderate certainty) but less downstream testing (RR, 0.56 [CI, 0.45 to 0.71]; very low certainty) than exercise ECG. Low-certainty evidence compared SPECT-MPI versus exercise ECG (2 trials), SPECT-MPI versus stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (1 trial), and stress echocardiography versus exercise ECG (1 trial).Most comparisons primarily rely on a single study, many studies were underpowered to detect potential differences in direct health outcomes, and individual patient data were lacking.For the initial assessment of patients with suspected stable CAD, CCTA was associated with similar health effects to direct ICA referral, and with a health benefit compared with exercise ECG and SPECT-MPI. Further research is needed to better assess the relative performance of each diagnostic strategy.None. (PROSPERO: CRD42022329635).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
天际发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
YFW完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
慕青应助青烟采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
封以亦发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Hello应助闪闪灵槐采纳,获得10
1秒前
Navan发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
wanci应助海绵宝宝采纳,获得10
2秒前
4秒前
5秒前
张潇潇发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
songsheng发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
不安青牛应助南宫子骞采纳,获得40
8秒前
8秒前
online1881完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
固态锂电专家完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
隐形曼青应助GC采纳,获得10
10秒前
qc发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
rain123发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
传奇3应助lyn_zhou采纳,获得10
11秒前
张潇潇完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
阿大呆呆应助任性易形采纳,获得50
13秒前
14秒前
Jamie123发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
miHoYo发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
Orange应助粱乘风采纳,获得10
16秒前
凯凯完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
Hello应助陶1122采纳,获得10
18秒前
19秒前
19秒前
黄超超完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
mi发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
瞌睡虫子完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
小赵完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
22秒前
领导范儿应助Giao采纳,获得10
23秒前
高分求助中
Thermodynamic data for steelmaking 3000
Counseling With Immigrants, Refugees, and Their Families From Social Justice Perspectives pages 800
Electrochemistry 500
Statistical Procedures for the Medical Device Industry 400
藍からはじまる蛍光性トリプタンスリン研究 400
Cardiology: Board and Certification Review 400
A History of the Global Economy 350
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2367027
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2076033
关于积分的说明 5192760
捐赠科研通 1803063
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 900288
版权声明 557960
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 480471