Impact of Genomic Classifiers on Risk Stratification and Treatment Intensity in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer

医学 前列腺癌 危险分层 肿瘤科 内科学 癌症
作者
Amir Alishahi Tabriz,Matthew J. Boyer,Adelaide M. Gordon,David Carpenter,Jeffrey R. Gingrich,Sudha R. Raman,Deepika Sirohi,Alexis Rompré‐Brodeur,Joseph Lunyera,Fahmin Basher,Rhonda L. Bitting,Andrzej S. Kosinski,Sarah Cantrell,Belinda Ear,Jennifer M. Gierisch,Morgan Jacobs,Karen M. Goldstein
出处
期刊:Annals of Internal Medicine [American College of Physicians]
被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.7326/annals-24-00700
摘要

Tissue-based genomic classifiers (GCs) have been developed to improve prostate cancer (PCa) risk assessment and treatment recommendations. To summarize the impact of the Decipher, Oncotype DX Genomic Prostate Score (GPS), and Prolaris GCs on risk stratification and patient-clinician decisions on treatment choice among patients with localized PCa considering first-line treatment. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science published from January 2010 to August 2024. Two investigators independently identified studies on risk classification and treatment choice after GC testing for patients with localized PCa considering first-line treatment. Relevant data extracted by 1 researcher and overread by a second. Risk of bias (ROB) was assessed in duplicate. Ten studies reported risk reclassification after GC testing. In low ROB observational studies, very low- or low-risk patients with PCa were more likely to have their risk levels classified as the same or lower (GPS, 100% to 88.1%; Decipher, 87.2% to 82.9%; Prolaris, 76.9%). However, 1 randomized trial found that GC testing with GPS reclassified 34.5% of very low-risk and 29.4% of low-risk patients to a higher risk category. Twelve observational studies indicated that treatment decisions after GC testing either remained unchanged or slightly favored active surveillance. In contrast, analyses from a single randomized trial found fewer choices for active surveillance after GPS testing. Heterogeneity in screening patterns, risk-determination cutoffs, pathology, and clinical practices. Studies on treatment choice were moderate to high ROB. Although GC tests do not consistently influence risk classification or treatment decisions, the differences observed between observational and randomized studies highlight a need for well-designed trials to explore the role of GC tests in patients with newly diagnosed PCa considering first-line treatment. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. (PROSPERO: CRD42022347950).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
白云垛完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
3秒前
高贵的花卷应助Lazzaro采纳,获得10
3秒前
ye完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
淡淡紫山发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
沛山应助机智的凡梦采纳,获得10
4秒前
Pooh发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
英俊的铭应助完美的书雁采纳,获得10
6秒前
自然冥茗发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
斯文败类应助灵巧谷梦采纳,获得10
8秒前
orixero应助王jj采纳,获得10
10秒前
小马甲应助ZJYcici采纳,获得10
11秒前
科研通AI5应助赵医生采纳,获得10
11秒前
leaolf应助Zfy采纳,获得10
13秒前
科研通AI2S应助学术妲己采纳,获得20
15秒前
16秒前
科研通AI6应助时代精神法采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
gqz完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助123采纳,获得10
19秒前
NexusExplorer应助朴素羊采纳,获得10
19秒前
沛山应助xxz666采纳,获得40
20秒前
salan完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
joshar发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
香蕉觅云应助Moonber采纳,获得10
22秒前
22秒前
Joey完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
zoey发布了新的文献求助80
23秒前
24秒前
科研通AI5应助橙子采纳,获得10
24秒前
云中子完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
tqmx完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
25秒前
26秒前
26秒前
26秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各位详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Pediatric Injectable Drugs 500
Instant Bonding Epoxy Technology 500
Methodology for the Human Sciences 500
ASHP Injectable Drug Information 2025 Edition 400
DEALKOXYLATION OF β-CYANOPROPIONALDEYHDE DIMETHYL ACETAL 400
Assessment of adverse effects of Alzheimer's disease medications: Analysis of notifications to Regional Pharmacovigilance Centers in Northwest France 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4373974
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3870772
关于积分的说明 12065530
捐赠科研通 3513447
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1928085
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 969864
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 868620