热力学
化学
分配系数
弗伦德利希方程
常量(计算机编程)
吸附
分布(数学)
分析化学(期刊)
物理化学
色谱法
物理
数学
数学分析
计算机科学
程序设计语言
摘要
Adsorption processes often include three important components: kinetics, isotherm, and thermodynamics. In the study of solid–liquid adsorption, “standard” thermodynamic equilibrium constant [Formula: see text]; dimensionless) plays an essential role in accurately calculating three thermodynamic parameters: the standard Gibbs energy change (∆ G°; kJ/mol), the standard change in enthalpy (∆ H°; kJ/mol), and the standard change in entropy [∆ S°; J/(mol × K)] of an adsorption process. Misconception of the derivation of the [Formula: see text] constant that can cause calculative errors in values (magnitude and sign) of the thermodynamic parameters has been intensively reflected through certain kinds of papers (i.e., letters to editor, discussions, short communications, and correspondence like comment/rebuttal). The distribution coefficient ( K D ) and Freundlich constant ( K F ) have been intensively applied for calculating the thermodynamic parameters. However, a critical question is whether K D or K F is equal to [Formula: see text]. This paper gives (1) thorough discussion on the derivation of thermodynamic equilibrium constant of solid–liquid adsorption process, (2) reasonable explanation on the inconsistency of (direct and indirect) application of K D or K F for calculating the thermodynamic parameters based on the derivation of [Formula: see text], and (3) helpful suggestions for improving the quality of papers published in this field.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI