亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

The safety and efficacy between remimazolam and propofol in intravenous anesthesia of endoscopy operation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 异丙酚 荟萃分析 麻醉 不利影响 置信区间 相对风险 麻醉剂 系统回顾 梅德林 外科 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Mei-ji Zhao,Haifeng Hu,Xinlei Li,X. Li,Dachuan Wang,Mingjie Kuang
出处
期刊:International Journal of Surgery [Wolters Kluwer]
被引量:34
标识
DOI:10.1097/js9.0000000000000638
摘要

Background: Propofol is the most widely used intravenous anesthetic in endoscopic surgery, but is associated with several adverse reactions. Public research has shown that remimazolam, a safe general anesthetic, is increasingly being used as a substitute for propofol in clinical operations. Our meta-analysis aimed to analyze whether the adverse reaction rate of remimazolam in endoscopic surgery is acceptable and whether the surgical success rate is not lower than that of propofol. Aim: This meta-analysis examined the adverse events and efficacy of remimazolam vs. propofol during endoscopic surgery. Method: MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar were comprehensively searched. Seven studies comparing remimazolam and propofol were included in our meta-analysis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and Cochrane manual were used to assess the quality of the results published in all included studies to ensure that our meta-analysis results are reliable and worthwhile. Results: Compared to propofol, the use of remimazolam reduced postoperative injection pain [Relative Risk (RR)=0.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03–0.12, P <0.00001], postoperative hypotension (RR=0.45, 95% CI: 0.28–0.73, P =0.001), and postoperative respiratory depression (RR=0.20, 95% CI: 0.08–0.47, P =0.0002); however, it also slightly reduced the success rate of the operation [Risk Difference (RD)=−0.02, 95% CI: −0.04–−0.01, P =0.0007]. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of bradycardia symptoms after the operation (RD=−0.01, 95% CI: −0.03–0.01, P =0.35), recovery time after the operation [STD Mean Difference (SMD)=0.68, 95% CI: −0.43–1.80, P =0.23] or discharge time (SMD=0.17, 95% CI: −0.58–0.23, P =0.41). We also performed a subgroup analysis of each corresponding outcome. Conclusion: Our analysis showed that remimazolam may be a safer shock option than propofol for endoscopic surgery. However, further research is required to determine their utility.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
lulu发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
7秒前
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
zzhbby发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
mmmm发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
21秒前
21秒前
22秒前
大个应助zzhbby采纳,获得10
25秒前
tangzhidi发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
tangzhidi发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
tangzhidi发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
tangzhidi发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
tangzhidi发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
tangzhidi发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
tangzhidi发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
wxq发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
gszy1975完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
科研通AI6.2应助tangzhidi采纳,获得150
47秒前
科研通AI6.3应助tangzhidi采纳,获得10
48秒前
赘婿应助tangzhidi采纳,获得10
48秒前
天天快乐应助tangzhidi采纳,获得10
48秒前
科研通AI6.4应助tangzhidi采纳,获得10
48秒前
小二郎应助tangzhidi采纳,获得20
48秒前
ZanE完成签到,获得积分10
48秒前
OsamaKareem应助tangzhidi采纳,获得10
48秒前
快点毕业应助大炮筒采纳,获得10
52秒前
大布丁应助传统的哲瀚采纳,获得10
53秒前
Lucas应助lian采纳,获得10
55秒前
1分钟前
Me发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
wxq完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
lian发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
zzhbby发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
研友_LMo56Z完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
缓慢怜菡给Dester的求助进行了留言
1分钟前
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals 800
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 640
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
天津市智库成果选编 600
全相对论原子结构与含时波包动力学的理论研究--清华大学 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6444409
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8258288
关于积分的说明 17591028
捐赠科研通 5503515
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2901346
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1878416
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1717707