Move to improve: Meta-analysis of workplace physical activity interventions.

心理学 心理干预 应用心理学 荟萃分析 职业紧张 体力活动 社会心理学 物理疗法 医学 精神科 内科学
作者
Alexander Nath,Sophia Schimmelpfennig,Charlotte Kreienbaum,Udo Konradt
出处
期刊:Journal of Occupational Health Psychology [American Psychological Association]
卷期号:30 (3): 176-198
标识
DOI:10.1037/ocp0000401
摘要

Extended periods of physical inactivity and sedentary behavior at the workplace are major risk factors for employees' health and functioning. To mitigate these risks, workplace physical activity interventions (WPAIs) are commonly implemented within occupational health management to promote employees' physical activity. This meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of WPAIs in reducing mental and physical health complaints and in improving organizational outcomes, such as absenteeism, job satisfaction, and productivity. Drawing on the biopsychosocial model, we investigate the additional impact of mindfulness-based intervention components (mind-body interventions) and group-based interventions. A systematic literature search for longitudinal randomized controlled trials across six databases (Web of Science, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE/Pubmed, Embase, APA PsycInfo, and Science Direct) yielded K = 80 randomized controlled trials. Using between-group postintervention comparisons, Bayesian three-level random-effects meta-analytic structural equation modeling revealed small to moderate positive effects for WPAIs. WPAIs were effective in reducing mental health complaints (k = 40, N = 6,602, g = -0.56), physical health complaints (k = 51, N = 7,856, g = -0.38), and improving organizational outcomes (k = 30, N = 6,680, g = 0.30). Mind-body interventions demonstrated greater effectiveness in reducing mental and physical health complaints and in improving organizational outcomes compared to body-only interventions. Group-based WPAIs were associated with better adherence within studies examining health complaints. A dose-response relationship was observed in studies investigating physical health complaints and organizational outcomes, indicating that increased WPAI usage increases benefits. Potential bias arising from unaccounted baseline values and substantial heterogeneity demand careful interpretation of findings and warrant further investigation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
gu发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
6666应助111采纳,获得10
1秒前
自信半梦发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
余治霆完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
李爱国应助小陈采纳,获得10
1秒前
赘婿应助leozhang采纳,获得10
2秒前
FashionBoy应助酒色财气采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
阿思完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
贪玩的誉完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
boge5633完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
秋风应助09nankai采纳,获得10
3秒前
pennyshuai发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
cyy完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
乐乐应助Doris采纳,获得10
5秒前
李清流发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
活泼的涵菡完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
LXN发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
邹百川发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
LSY发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
桐桐应助大力的洪纲采纳,获得10
6秒前
超级觅风发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
科研通AI6.2应助刀刀采纳,获得10
8秒前
dog完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
现代海发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
曹泽宇完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
韦智杰发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
A Case Study on Hotels as Noncongregate Emergency Living Accommodations for Returning Citizens 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7756775
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9303233
关于积分的说明 20273370
捐赠科研通 7340276
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3311624
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2462509
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2325235