Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy with or without macroscopic on-site evaluation: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial

医学 随机对照试验 内镜超声 细针活检 放射科 胰腺癌 活检 核医学 外科 内科学 细针穿刺 癌症
作者
Benedetto Mangiavillano,Stefano Francesco Crinò,Antonio Facciorusso,Francesco Di Matteo,Carmelo Barbera,Alberto Larghi,Gianenrico Rizzatti,Silvia Carrara,Marco Spadaccini,Francesco Auriemma,Carlo Fabbri,Cecilia Binda,Chiara Coluccio,Gianmarco Marocchi,Teresa Staiano,Maria Cristina Conti Bellocchi,Laura Bernardoni,Leonardo Henry Eusebi,Giovanna Grazia Cirota,Germana de Nucci,Serena Stigliano,Gianpiero Manes,Giacomo Bonanno,Andrew Ofosu,Laura Lamonaca,Danilo Paduano,Federica Spatola,Alessandro Repici
出处
期刊:Endoscopy [Thieme Medical Publishers (Germany)]
卷期号:55 (02): 129-137 被引量:29
标识
DOI:10.1055/a-1915-5263
摘要

Background The advantage of using the macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) technique during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) performed with 22G Franseen needles has not been investigated. We aimed to compare EUS-FNB with MOSE vs. EUS-FNB performed with three needle passes. Methods This randomized trial involved 10 Italian referral centers. Consecutive patients referred for EUS-FNB of pancreatic or nonpancreatic solid lesions were included in the study and randomized to the two groups. MOSE was performed by gross visualization of the collected material by the endoscopists and considered adequate when a white/yellowish aggregate core longer than 10 mm was retrieved. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes were specimen adequacy, number of needle passes, and safety. Results 370 patients with 234 pancreatic lesions (63.2 %) and 136 nonpancreatic lesions (36.8 %) were randomized (190 EUS-FNB with MOSE and 180 with standard EUS-FNB). No statistically significant differences were found between EUS-FNB with MOSE and conventional EUS-FNB in terms of diagnostic accuracy (90.0 % [95 %CI 84.8 %–93.9 %] vs. 87.8 % [95 %CI 82.1 %–92.2 %]; P = 0.49), sample adequacy (93.1 % [95 %CI 88.6 %–96.3 %] vs. 95.5 % [95 %CI 91.4 %–98 %]; P = 0.31), and rate of adverse events (2.6 % vs. 1.1 %; P = 0.28). The median number of passes was significantly lower in the EUS-FNB with MOSE group (1 vs. 3; P < 0.001). Conclusions The accuracy of EUS-FNB with MOSE is noninferior to that of EUS-FNB with three needle passes. MOSE reliably assesses sample adequacy and reduces the number of needle passes required to obtain the diagnosis with a 22G Franseen needle.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
灵巧汉堡完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
4秒前
高高的丹雪完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
yulx001完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助zhang采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
具体问题具体分析完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
ponyy发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
lizhiqian2024发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
归尘发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
曾经的贞发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
Zhao发布了新的文献求助50
11秒前
conny完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
华仔应助yulx001采纳,获得10
11秒前
小肖的KYT完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
曾经的贞完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
dada完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
BOLIN完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
17秒前
会神发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
小白完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
PPP完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
paul发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
海上森林的一只猫完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
皮皮完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
lizhiqian2024发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
21秒前
小白关注了科研通微信公众号
21秒前
TWei发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
西北吴彦祖完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
Lolo完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
你还是要加油完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
jaslek完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
真三发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
结实山水完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
ponyy完成签到,获得积分20
28秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 2500
Technologies supporting mass customization of apparel: A pilot project 450
Brain and Heart The Triumphs and Struggles of a Pediatric Neurosurgeon 400
Cybersecurity Blueprint – Transitioning to Tech 400
Mixing the elements of mass customisation 400
Периодизация спортивной тренировки. Общая теория и её практическое применение 310
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3782959
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3328287
关于积分的说明 10235585
捐赠科研通 3043430
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1670491
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 799731
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 759050